Originally posted by teamsaint
View Post
The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
I wonder whether it all goes in phases or cycles . We tend make the Enlightment assumption that everything constantly improves . It doesn’t. Cultures decline , libraries are burnt , cities are sacked. Then seemingly new things emerge , new talents, it’s just that there aren’t that many around at the moment. Even popular culture is in massive decline. Taylor Swift is massively less musically interesting than the Beatles.
. We live in a time of cultural abundance - everything available at the touch of a button - but with so much rubbish to sift through,
Most of the arts are indeed moribund, within the declining West; and that itself might be a symptom, rather than a cause, of the equally strong decline in the quality of popular culture. Without a strong popular culture, there can be no "high art". In the UK we have precious little of either which speaks to us directly, with popular music (Beatles included) having been reliant on American models (and accents) since the mid-1950s. And despite the current political winds of change, there is no sign of our chronic cultural, transatlantic dependence ending anytime soon.
Aside from all that, your "touch of the button" is of course the root of the problem. We no longer have to make our own music, art - or even our dinner. And this diminishes us. Just as it has diminished Radio 3.
Comment
-
-
I've noticed this decline in the 'new' music played on Radio 3, which is so often 'old' music re-gurgitated: repetitious cliches of diatonic melody and tonal harmony, often referencing still older music. I'd love to think that somewhere there are composers who are producing genuinely creative and imaginative work, which is being ignored by Radio 3 because, as it seems, Sam Jackson doesn't like atonal music; there's been a big reduction in even 100-year-old music since he took over.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostI've noticed this decline in the 'new' music played on Radio 3, which is so often 'old' music re-gurgitated: repetitious cliches of diatonic melody and tonal harmony, often referencing still older music. I'd love to think that somewhere there are composers who are producing genuinely creative and imaginative work, which is being ignored by Radio 3 because, as it seems, Sam Jackson doesn't like atonal music; there's been a big reduction in even 100-year-old music since he took over.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
This realisation came as a bit of a ( slow motion) shock to me some while back.As a History student I should have known better I suppose. Not sure exactly when it started , but possibly triggered by the Iraq war.
One of the disappointing things about contemporary life is the generational warfare being waged by large sections of the media ( and I don’t mean just The Mail) the fallout from which may well include cultural impoverishment .
Advances in AI are going to be a further issue for the arts. If I was in charge, 6th form and Uni students would have compulsory lessons in, among other things, how to deal with cultural over- abundance. The change from music being expensive and hard to access to the current situation has happened far too quickly for comfort.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostI've noticed this decline in the 'new' music played on Radio 3, which is so often 'old' music re-gurgitated: repetitious cliches of diatonic melody and tonal harmony, often referencing still older music. I'd love to think that somewhere there are composers who are producing genuinely creative and imaginative work, which is being ignored by Radio 3 because, as it seems, Sam Jackson doesn't like atonal music; there's been a big reduction in even 100-year-old music since he took over.
Most musicians can only make money on the platform by writing songs inoffensive enough to get on to one of its vapid playlists, says Guardian columnist John Harris
The requirement to be all things to all listeners can't help either - lowest common denominator comes into play, to the detriment of all.
I don't think SJ is keen on Classical either, and as for Baroque and Early - forget it.
Comment
-
Comment