The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place

[oddoneout]

Och, I have a wee small spot for Sarah.

Too small for Kate as well?

[antongould]

Och, I have a wee small spot for Sarah.

Me too ...... but then I have no problem with Alkers - life in the leper colony isn’t too bad at this time of year ......

[Nick Armstrong]

Sarah

Kate?

[oddoneout]

Kate?

Molleson, who seems to be generally reasonably well liked.
Which Sarah btw?

[Nick Armstrong]

Molleson, who seems to be generally reasonably well liked.

Which Sarah btw?

Hence my suggestion...

Re. Molleson, my #8443 refers

[kernelbogey]

Sorry - I meant Kate (Molleson).

[cloughie]

This thread is resembling a Two Ronnies’ pub conversation.

[Stanfordian]

This thread is resembling a Two Ronnies’ pub conversation.

The Fork Handles sketch

[antongould]

Sorry - I meant Kate (Molleson).

I know what you meant kernelbogey ..... and I’m a fan ......

[kernelbogey]

I know what you meant kernelbogey ..... and I’m a fan ......

Well - taking an idea from the Python Australian Philosophy Department, we could call all R3 female prsenters Sarah, to avoid confusion.

[antongould]

Well - taking an idea from the Python Australian Philosophy Department, we could call all R3 female prsenters Sarah, to avoid confusion.

..... indeed and all the male cast Petroc ......

[kernelbogey]

..... indeed and all the male cast Petroc ......

Shurely Tom...?

[Eine Alpensinfonie]

So here we are, talking about presenters, as though they are the most important thing. I know they have delusions of grandeur about themselves and each other, but it’s a pity they’ve trained so many of us to think the same way.

[antongould]

Shurely Tom...?

Statistically sound .........

[antongould]

So here we are, talking about presenters, as though they are the most important thing. I know they have delusions of grandeur about themselves and each other, but it’s a pity they’ve trained so many of us to think the same way.

To be fair I wasn’t trained - frivolity runs in the family