The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • antongould
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 8778

    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
    "The Gasper" ... ???
    Sorry Leader ..... one of our number is convinced that Petroc gasps through every announcement .......

    Comment

    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
      Gone fishin'
      • Sep 2011
      • 30163

      Ah! Thank you, anton - that could lead to a little in-forum divertissement of thinking up nicknames for the presenters: The Gabbler; The Lisper; The Nanny .... perhaps not: sounds like a bunch of rejected ideas for Batman villains.

      But does this make Jonathan Swain the "Gasper de la Nuit"?
      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

      Comment

      • Old Grumpy
        Full Member
        • Jan 2011
        • 3596

        Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
        Ah! Thank you, anton - that could lead to a little in-forum divertissement of thinking up nicknames for the presenters: The Gabbler; The Lisper; The Nanny .... perhaps not: sounds like a bunch of rejected ideas for Batman villains.

        But does this make Jonathan Swain the "Gasper de la Nuit"?
        Excellent, FHG.

        OG

        Comment

        • oddoneout
          Full Member
          • Nov 2015
          • 9141

          Originally posted by antongould View Post
          The Gasper reading the News ...... ???? ..... and very well too IMVVHO .....
          I agree, but for me it does raise the question as to why he can't do the presenting in a similarly punctuation-observed, consistent fashion. His habit of losing the ends of phrases by going very quiet (mumbling would be another way of putting it) is infuriating, especially when they include the info about composer/performer.

          Comment

          • antongould
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 8778

            Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
            Excellent, FHG.

            OG
            Excellent indeed fhg .......

            Comment

            • cloughie
              Full Member
              • Dec 2011
              • 22114

              Originally posted by LMcD View Post
              Are you referring to the ineffable Paddy O'Connell, who read the 0800 bulletin?
              I hope he’s ineffable - particularly if he’s reading the news on the BBC!

              Comment

              • LezLee
                Full Member
                • Apr 2019
                • 634

                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post

                But does this make Jonathan Swain the "Gasper de la Nuit"?
                Love it!

                Comment

                • hmvman
                  Full Member
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 1097

                  Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
                  I agree, but for me it does raise the question as to why he can't do the presenting in a similarly punctuation-observed, consistent fashion. His habit of losing the ends of phrases by going very quiet (mumbling would be another way of putting it) is infuriating, especially when they include the info about composer/performer.
                  Agreed on that, but PT's not the only culprit; it seems to be a trait amongst several of the current crop of presenters. Tom Service and Katie Derham are particularly bad offenders. It's particularly annoying when listening in a car where the tailing off means the information is lost altogether under road noise. Perhaps they think we're all listening on headphones or to hi-fi in quiet rooms.

                  Comment

                  • oddoneout
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2015
                    • 9141

                    Originally posted by hmvman View Post
                    Agreed on that, but PT's not the only culprit; it seems to be a trait amongst several of the current crop of presenters. Tom Service and Katie Derham are particularly bad offenders. It's particularly annoying when listening in a car where the tailing off means the information is lost altogether under road noise. Perhaps they think we're all listening on headphones or to hi-fi in quiet rooms.


                    I doubt thinking comes into it; they don't hear themselves as we hear them and I doubt anyone at the business end notices either, so it goes unchallenged. I don't listen to either of the above mentioned presenters except by accident so that reduces the inconvenience.

                    Comment

                    • hmvman
                      Full Member
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 1097

                      Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
                      [/B]I don't listen to either of the above mentioned presenters except by accident so that reduces the inconvenience.
                      Very wise!

                      Comment

                      • LMcD
                        Full Member
                        • Sep 2017
                        • 8402

                        Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                        I hope he’s ineffable - particularly if he’s reading the news on the BBC!
                        I've become a regular listener to 'B.H.' on Sunday mornings. Apart from an inexplicable devotion to the Eurovision Song Contest, Paddy's a splendid fellow.

                        Comment

                        • oddoneout
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2015
                          • 9141

                          Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                          I hope he’s ineffable - particularly if he’s reading the news on the BBC!
                          This set off one of those niggles that took a while to pin down - eff and ineffable. Turns out it was T S Eliot's 'The Naming of Cats' - "His ineffable effable Effanineffable"
                          These days it sounds rather more dubious than perhaps it did when it was written.
                          Douglas Adams' take on it is more aware I would imagine
                          “Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable. Let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.”

                          Comment

                          • vinteuil
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 12782

                            .

                            ... and not forgetting -




                            .

                            Comment

                            • Eine Alpensinfonie
                              Host
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 20570

                              Originally posted by antongould View Post
                              Sorry Leader ..... one of our number is convinced that Petroc gasps through every announcement .......
                              Guilty as charged. But everyone has to breath somewhere. It’s just a pity that so many R3 announcers don’t choose to do this between sentences.

                              Comment

                              • Serial_Apologist
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 37589

                                Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
                                Excellent, FHG.

                                OG
                                Don't tell him that - he'll only ravel in it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X