The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ein Heldenleben
    Full Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 6782

    Originally posted by vinteuil View Post

    ... I think it's also appropriate within the academical community for professional academics to have their doctorates acknowledged - for professional porpoises only, though. Plus the occasional honorary one - Dr Johnson, Dr Burney. And possibly ecclesiastics. But certainly not in this case
    I deleted my original post so this excerpted sentence doesn’t make sense without it. I deleted it because it’s just not worth writing about but to summarise I think it’s misleading to use the title Doctor in any field that has a medical element. It’s perfectly ok to use the title doctor in an academic context where it might be important professionally . Mark Porter is a medically qualified doctor (specifically he is a Bachelor of Medicine ). He also is a practising GP. Quite a few medical doctors do not use the title when they give up their licence to practise ,
    Last edited by Ein Heldenleben; Today, 15:07.

    Comment

    • Sir Velo
      Full Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 3229

      Originally posted by Master Jacques View Post

      But those trailers - especially for the anodyne pap of Classical Unwind perpetrated by "Dr. Sian Williams" (who except the terminally insecure would insist, like this one does, on the "Dr." in this context?) - are the limit.
      Clearly the form of address is designed to denote the medical authority required to curate a programme of such lofty, therapeutic ambition!

      Comment

      Working...
      X