Originally posted by oddoneout
View Post
The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostWould they otherwise have broadcast the Latvian Radio Choir (Silvestrov: To Thee We Sing)? That's the point.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
It's something that's been going on for a long time. I'm pretty sure I'm not misremembering that Ian Skelly for instance, before his banishment from the morning schedule, would link items to evening concert content or similar. Such a link seems reasonable to me - although additional input from an advert I would consider unnecessary - as it's all directly R3 related. Linking to TV content I find more questionable, especially when it has absolutely nothing to do with R3 content. I was going to add "or purpose" but since that seems open to differing interpretations these days better to omit it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by antongould View PostIs this the proper place to say that I enjoy Breakfast? I find the mix and length of pieces about right, both presenters excellent and the texts, emails, newspapers and trailers no real "problem".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View Post
Although the increasingly frequent trails are increasingly irritating, the mixture of familiar and unfamiliar musical items, arts-related news items, birthday and anniversary celebrations and obituaries on weekday editions is otherwise just what I need over the first few hours of the day. Unfortunately, things generally start going downhill from 0900, the only remaining bright spot being, on occasions, the Lunchtime Concert. Am I the only person whose musical tastes and needs change as the day progresses?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hmvman View Post
I feel much the same. If I'm at home and listening in the mornings after 9 o'clock when R3 is terrible, I switch over to YLE Klassinen where I can hear complete works with no endless chatter and ads. They often play chamber music in the mornings which I like to listen to at that time. The Breakfast hotch-potch is ok for me as I'm not really paying too much attention. I don't want a Mahler or Bruckner symphony at that early part of the day!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hmvman View PostI don't want a Mahler or Bruckner symphony at that early part of the day!It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View Post
Although the increasingly frequent trails are increasingly irritating, the mixture of familiar and unfamiliar musical items, arts-related news items, birthday and anniversary celebrations and obituaries on weekday editions is otherwise just what I need over the first few hours of the day. Unfortunately, things generally start going downhill from 0900, the only remaining bright spot being, on occasions, the Lunchtime Concert. Am I the only person whose musical tastes and needs change as the day progresses?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
But isn't it a straw man argument that people are asking, or secretly yearning, for 'a Mahler or Bruckner symphony at that early part of the day' or even single movements thereof? Surely something exists between the ridiculous and the ridiculous? The sublime, possibly.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
But isn't it a straw man argument that people are asking, or secretly yearning, for 'a Mahler or Bruckner symphony at that early part of the day' or even single movements thereof? Surely something exists between the ridiculous and the ridiculous? The sublime, possibly.
While on the subject of single movements, if we must have them could programme planners, schedulers or whatever they're called PLEASE give the Adagietto from Mahler's 5th a rest? How about giving the Andante from the 6th an occasional airing?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View Post
I must admit that, having never heard the expression 'straw man argument', I had to look it up and then failed to understand either the explanation or the accompanying exampleIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
In general it refers to opposing an argument/accusation which has never been made. No one (what no one?) is suggesting that they want to hear a Mahler or Bruckner symphony on Breakfast, so saying that you don't want to hear that (especially to defend a point of view) is a 'straw man' - easily blown over, I presume.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
But isn't it a straw man argument that people are asking, or secretly yearning, for 'a Mahler or Bruckner symphony at that early part of the day' or even single movements thereof? Surely something exists between the ridiculous and the ridiculous? The sublime, possibly.
If Radio 3 did a Mahler / Bruckner symphony every morning till doomsday I’d be ecstatic - happier indeed than listening to Georgia M and the saga of her producer’s earrings which took up part of todays offerings.
Comment
-
Comment