The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ein Heldenleben
    Full Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 6740

    Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
    The debate is whether Breakfast is a Good programme or a Bad programme, and is potentially eternal, in the sense that it may never be resolved (or indeed revolved, much like the discussion!)
    It’s essentially irresolvable. However, to borrow a cancel-culture phrase, the excellence of Petroc is not “up for debate “ surely ?

    Comment

    • cloughie
      Full Member
      • Dec 2011
      • 22113

      This filibuster is working towards the 10000 nicely!

      Comment

      • Ein Heldenleben
        Full Member
        • Apr 2014
        • 6740

        Originally posted by cloughie View Post
        This filibuster is working towards the 10000 nicely!
        I would like to debate whether a post deliberately aimed at reaching 1000 posts can genuinely be considered as part of the Eternal Breakfast debate when a genuine (though irrelevant) series of posts on categorisation have been hived off and as a consequence generated an 80 odd post shortfall …

        Comment

        • gradus
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 5602

          Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
          The debate is whether Breakfast is a Good programme or a Bad programme, and is potentially eternal, in the sense that it may never be resolved (or indeed revolved, much like the discussion!)
          I am very much in favour of Breakfast, programme or no - I think it needed to be said.

          Comment

          • antongould
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 8777

            Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
            It’s essentially irresolvable. However, to borrow a cancel-culture phrase, the excellence of Petroc is not “up for debate “ surely ?
            Petroc has been criticised on this thread for his manner of breathing IIRC …. but to me at least he is a national treasure …… always MVVHO of course …

            Comment

            • oddoneout
              Full Member
              • Nov 2015
              • 9141

              Originally posted by antongould View Post
              Petroc has been criticised on this thread for his manner of breathing IIRC …. but to me at least he is a national treasure …… always MVVHO of course …
              Which is why I found the Christmas Day offering a bit disappointing I think; an attempt at a different approach that didn't work for this listener. The river journey week in Yorkshire was so good though that it compensates for that in the year as a whole.
              Does anyone know what reaction, if any, there has been to the 25th Dec programme? I thought I heard Petroc on (?)Monday quoting from a listener's message along the lines of classical music free zone.

              Comment

              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 20570

                Originally posted by antongould View Post
                Petroc has been criticised on this thread for his manner of breathing IIRC …. but to me at least he is a national treasure …… always MVVHO of course …
                Not just Petroc. I think it must have been a directive to not leave any silences between sentences. Other presenters developed the same habit, so perhaps pointing the finger at one individual was wrong. However, National Treasure or not, Breakfast on Radio 3 remains a bleeding chunk jabbering disaster.

                Comment

                • seabright
                  Full Member
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 625

                  Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                  Not just Petroc. I think it must have been a directive to not leave any silences between sentences. Other presenters developed the same habit, so perhaps pointing the finger at one individual was wrong. However, National Treasure or not, Breakfast on Radio 3 remains a bleeding chunk jabbering disaster.
                  I find myself increasingly reaching for the 'off' switch when something ghastly comes on, which it usually does most mornings.

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30234

                    Originally posted by seabright View Post
                    I find myself increasingly reaching for the 'off' switch when something ghastly comes on, which it usually does most mornings.
                    When I replied on the Essential Classics thread, I found I'd mistakenly written 'Breakfast' instead of 'Essential Classics'. But I only had to change the programme name, not the content of the post.

                    For me, a presenter can make a programme unlistenable by ruining the content: s/he/they can't make it listenable because listening to a programme isn't about the presenter. I'd amend that: it can't make a 'playlist' programme listenable. A feature/documentary is substantially about what the presenter has to say.
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • Eine Alpensinfonie
                      Host
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 20570

                      Originally posted by french frank View Post

                      For me, a presenter can make a programme unlistenable by ruining the content: s/he/they can't make it listenable because listening to a programme isn't about the presenter. I'd amend that: it can't make a 'playlist' programme listenable. A feature/documentary is substantially about what the presenter has to say.
                      It’s a pity the Radio 3 management team can’t understand that basic concept.

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30234

                        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                        It’s a pity the Radio 3 management team can’t understand that basic concept.
                        It may be a 'basic concept' but it isn't one which even everyone here agrees with!
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • Serial_Apologist
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 37586

                          Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
                          Do I detect a currant of dissatisfaction?
                          In my case just one hot cross bun - preceded by the usual bran flakes...

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30234

                            Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                            In my case just one hot cross bun
                            Calm down, Cereal.
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • cloughie
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2011
                              • 22113

                              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                              Not just Petroc. I think it must have been a directive to not leave any silences between sentences. Other presenters developed the same habit, so perhaps pointing the finger at one individual was wrong. However, National Treasure or not, Breakfast on Radio 3 remains a bleeding chunk jabbering disaster.
                              His pace of delivery has mellowed, Alps - I’ve not always thought so but now I do think he is a really good broadcaster and his acquired knowledge has clearly helped his delivery. I think that he deserves more credit than given by some on the forum.

                              Comment

                              • Serial_Apologist
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 37586

                                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                                Calm down, Cereal.
                                I think I detect something of the tone of David Cameron in there!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X