Originally posted by french frank
View Post
The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostSo long as it stays on Saturday, and that one outing is sufficient to tick the relevant box, I can live with ( although I don't have to like) it, as that is now the one day of the week when I rarely listen to R3. What would be a concern is if the listener response is seen as a green light to extend "the offer" to other days - ie go back to the bad old days.
Mendelssohn's Octet (in fact played by more than eight ) has now given way to Robert Schumann IV, which has pleasantly soothing qualities for me going back to teenage years, so back to bed now with him....
(Above is not for me off-thread, although I've given TTN for examples, because much of what I've written would apply to Breakfast. But the Saturday show is really off-limits for me, simply because the presentation is strident in its effect on me in the way I've described.)Last edited by kernelbogey; 22-11-21, 08:25.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostThen I have swiftly to deploy the off switch, although if I don't, it does not (as for FF) negate the prior soothing.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostNot unusually, I'm in a minority .
Originally posted by french frank View PostI do think of calm as being a state being currently experienced. I can't think how irritation - or indeed sudden 'stridency' - doesn't end the calm. Unless one has become so sedated that one snoozes comfortably and doesn't experience it as irritating?
So I think this is a complex subject. I am aware, from my very few and brief attempts to listen to Saturday breakfast, that I can become enraged - truly! - by presentation that belongs, IMVHO, on another network (preferably on another continent, and the other side of the Equator). That really does require (a) deploying the off switch, and (b) shouting words that I couldn't possibly document here, at the now silent radiio.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostNot unusually, I'm in a minority . I do think of calm as being a state being currently experienced. I can't think how irritation - or indeed sudden 'stridency' - doesn't end the calm. Unless one has become so sedated that one snoozes comfortably and doesn't experience it as irritating?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View Post....I am all too aware that the adverse effects of the crass R3 adverts are at least as much to do with resentment about the fact of their imposition and my lack of control over them as about the break of mood from the music that may have preceded them....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostMany of my generation lived through the music of the 1960s and 70s - in my case the jazz and contemporary music, and some of the Progressive rock - it was part of our landscape. I do wonder if today's youth experience life filtered through music in the same way. I think probably young black people do: I find I often cross paths with young black women, in particular, singing along to their headphones as they walk down the street or through the supermarket. Black guys one often sees listening to very loud R&B, Rap, Soul or Reggae on their car stereos, so they often do, but unless it's someone practising I don't hear loud music coming from people's homes to anything like the same extent I did when young, when showing your tastes to the world seemed to be a mark of display, which it undoubtedly is with those guys with loud beat boxes in their cars.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostNot so much "in case there's something on" ff but knowing that there will be something, indeed probably several somethings, which will be worth hearing/give me pleasure/make me think, and that I won't have to wait long for them. And yes it is comforting in some respects, but fortunately we haven't yet got to the stage of that being a bar to listening to R3.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by letterreader202 View PostSome years ago, just before I retired, I was working in London but drove home to Scotland (and back again) for holidays six times a year. I started off travelling with a supply of my favourite CDs but after a few trips decided that I preferred the serendipitous pleasures of Radio 3 on the radio. There were occasions when I simply had to change but, on the whole, R3, with occasional forays into R4, could keep me going for the whole journey.
Comment
-
-
I was absolutely astonished to hear complaints about Mario Lanza being played on this show. This is very sad. Why the complaints about one of the best tenors ever? We should hear more of him I say. There seems to be a faction of classical music lovers who do not like anything that is popular, but yet I never see any complaints about jazz on R3. What are the reasons for these complaints?
Comment
-
Comment