The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Andy Freude

    Originally posted by antongould View Post
    But response to and appreciation of classical music varies enormously from person to person and I am not sure that “ditch the whole 06:30 to noon shambles” is a fair or reasonable position .....
    That is really breathtakingly unfair. How about:- "Giving over the entire morning from 6.30 to noon to forming 'a bridge for newcomers to classical music' is not a fair or reasonable position"? Effectively, you are saying that Radio 3 (apart from the less popular slots) should be for newcomers; and devotees of classical music should pick out the few remaining programmes that suit them, on Sounds if it's inconvenient to listen to them live. But newcomers and - what? light listeners? less attentive listeners? listeners who want light entertainment rather than education? - should definitely have the whole of the morning, six days a week.

    ferneyhoughgeliebte makes the point: newcomers to classical music already have Classic FM and now Scala Radio. Why should they have all the popular listening hours on Radio 3 as well because BBC managers want to get their share of the big audiences? Radio 3 mornings are well dumbed down, the excuse being that lots of people like it. Wow.

    Comment

    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
      Gone fishin'
      • Sep 2011
      • 30163

      Originally posted by antongould View Post
      So how, given a shrinking resource, do you create/maintain the bridge or do we, in your opinion, not need or deserve one ....
      Andy has already answered that one:

      Originally posted by Andy Freude View Post
      newcomers to classical music already have Classic FM and now Scala Radio.
      ... given those two already-existing options, and the fact (how many times do I have to repeat this?) the fact that there is no British broadcaster who meets the needs of listeners who require different content and presentation, then it falls to the BBC to provide it for us. Or do we, in your opinion, not need or deserve one?
      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

      Comment

      • Edgy 2
        Guest
        • Jan 2019
        • 2035

        Originally posted by Andy Freude View Post
        That is really breathtakingly unfair. How about:- "Giving over the entire morning from 6.30 to noon to forming 'a bridge for newcomers to classical music' is not a fair or reasonable position"? Effectively, you are saying that Radio 3 (apart from the less popular slots) should be for newcomers; and devotees of classical music should pick out the few remaining programmes that suit them, on Sounds if it's inconvenient to listen to them live. But newcomers and - what? light listeners? less attentive listeners? listeners who want light entertainment rather than education? - should definitely have the whole of the morning, six days a week.

        ferneyhoughgeliebte makes the point: newcomers to classical music already have Classic FM and now Scala Radio. Why should they have all the popular listening hours on Radio 3 as well because BBC managers want to get their share of the big audiences? Radio 3 mornings are well dumbed down, the excuse being that lots of people like it. Wow.
        That’s what I now do.
        On the odd occasions I stumble upon breakfast,essential classics or in tune (for a few seconds) I honestly can’t tell the difference between them and Classic FM other than the adverts (I’ve never tried Saga FM)
        For heaven’s sake even BaL is a no go area for me now.
        “Music is the best means we have of digesting time." — Igor Stravinsky

        Comment

        • Andy Freude

          Originally posted by antongould View Post
          You have indeed, but, as has been said before, given the government’s view of the BBC do you, realistically, think there is any chance of that ..... ??? So how, given a shrinking resource, do you create/maintain the bridge or do we, in your opinion, not need or deserve one ....
          'You' (whoever 'you' is intended to designate) don't need one since Classic FM and Scala Radio have been launched for 'you'. If they don't suit 'your' needs, imagine a situation where Radio 3 doesn't suit us. But we have nowhere else to go as far as either BBC or commercial broadcasting is concerned.

          James Bloody Purnell says:- "'Radio used to be a background medium, often put on without thinking. But not any more, now it needs to earn its place in someone's day...." A background medium is exactly what Radio3 has become. It may earn its place in someone's day, but increasingly seldom in ours. SURELY to goodness, that point isn't difficult to grasp?

          It's a question of what Radio 3's main purpose is (or was). It did not need to form a bridge for newcomers to introduce them to classical music because the BBC did that already - on Radio 2/the Light Programme and Radio 4/the Home Service, as well as on television.

          The problem is that all the BBC wants to do is increase Radio 3's audience, which is light miles away from introducing them to classical music. Capeesh?

          Comment

          • Serial_Apologist
            Full Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 37588

            Originally posted by Andy Freude View Post
            That is really breathtakingly unfair. How about:- "Giving over the entire morning from 6.30 to noon to forming 'a bridge for newcomers to classical music' is not a fair or reasonable position"? Effectively, you are saying that Radio 3 (apart from the less popular slots) should be for newcomers; and devotees of classical music should pick out the few remaining programmes that suit them, on Sounds if it's inconvenient to listen to them live. But newcomers and - what? light listeners? less attentive listeners? listeners who want light entertainment rather than education? - should definitely have the whole of the morning, six days a week.

            ferneyhoughgeliebte makes the point: newcomers to classical music already have Classic FM and now Scala Radio. Why should they have all the popular listening hours on Radio 3 as well because BBC managers want to get their share of the big audiences? Radio 3 mornings are well dumbed down, the excuse being that lots of people like it. Wow.
            Exactly - and well said! One could add by rhetorically asking, for what type of listening experience is the interrupted, episodic character of either Breakfast or Essential Classics purporting to "educate" the newcomers - just assuming it is, of course?

            Comment

            • teamsaint
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 25192

              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
              Andy has already answered that one:



              ... given those two already-existing options, and the fact (how many times do I have to repeat this?) the fact that there is no British broadcaster who meets the needs of listeners who require different content and presentation, then it falls to the BBC to provide it for us. Or do we, in your opinion, not need or deserve one?
              The point that nobody ( and apologies if they have and I missed it) has dealt with is the fact that there is plenty of time and space for R3 to cater to both its own desire to build a new audience whilst maintaining or expanding its more in depth content.
              24 hours a day broadcasting, its web pages and BBC Sounds give plenty of scope. Cash might be an issue, ( though they seem to fill the time available) but space isn’t.
              Last edited by teamsaint; 02-02-20, 21:58. Reason: Trypos
              I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

              I am not a number, I am a free man.

              Comment

              • oddoneout
                Full Member
                • Nov 2015
                • 9141

                Originally posted by Edgy 2 View Post
                That’s what I now do.
                On the odd occasions I stumble upon breakfast,essential classics or in tune (for a few seconds) I honestly can’t tell the difference between them and Classic FM other than the adverts (I’ve never tried Saga FM)
                For heaven’s sake even BaL is a no go area for me now.
                It's quite a significant difference if listening is a daily rather than intermittent occurrence, and is the reason often given for CFM listeners moving to R3. That is not a reason for R3 to become fullfat CFM for the whole morning though - and (anecdotally at least) is unnecessary since despite assumptions not all CFM listeners are incapable of coping with 'proper' R3 output.
                It's a question of what Radio 3's main purpose is (or was). It did not need to form a bridge for newcomers to introduce them to classical music because the BBC did that already - on Radio 2/the Light Programme and Radio 4/the Home Service, as well as on television.
                But since that no longer seems to be the case Andy should there be no bridge or should R3 try and fill the gap - but not by the current methods I hasten to add.

                Comment

                • Andy Freude

                  Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
                  But since that no longer seems to be the case Andy should there be no bridge or should R3 try and fill the gap - but not by the current methods I hasten to add.
                  From the time (before my time listening to Radio 3!) Radio 3 broadcast such programmes as Pied Piper (for young listeners) or Sounds Interesting (for 'eclectic tastes') Radio 3 has always broadcast programmes for other listeners. But the amount of airtime now devoted to the newcomer/young/casual goes well beyond the specially crafted programmes for those who hadn't yet reached the nirvana of the classical devotee. To be honest, an evening concert whose USP is that 'you can't hear that unique performance anywhere else' isn't enough to buy continued loyalty.

                  Given that people who want to develop a new taste for classical music only have to sit by the radio and listen-to-the-bloody-music, why do they also need to have presenters making inane comments which add little to their knowledge? Are they really incapable of sitting and listening to one piece of music for 30 mins or so? If so, classical music probably isn't for them anyway.

                  'But not by the current methods' - exactly! That's mainly what makes programmes impossible to listen to.

                  Comment

                  • Andrew Slater
                    Full Member
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 1790

                    Fuller BBC version here (I haven't read it yet, but suspect it'll add fuel to the fire ).

                    Comment

                    • antongould
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 8778

                      At the risk of being even more breathtakingly unfair I would comment as follows ...

                      The bridge that used to be there on R2 a couple of decades ago is now totally gone and, as has been said on another thread, the station has become almost totally 80s/90s pop .......

                      For people who wish to listen to the old style R3 the facility to download TTN is easily available - as Edgy points out - and a number of members have said they do this - my suspicion, maybe unfounded and unfair, is that if TTN ran live from 05:30 to 12:00 a lot of the people who attack the morning output wouldn’t listen, given the size of their CD collections and streaming services .....

                      I do find myself educated by the morning output, often by the much hated Playlister Challenge (?) when, obviously very knowledgeable, listeners suggest pieces that many others, myself included, have never heard before.

                      As to CFM and Scala being available bridges ..... I think I am not alone in hating the intrusion of constantly repeated advertisements .... further as someone pointed out their playlists are hardly inspiring .......

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                        Or do we, in your opinion, not need or deserve one?
                        Originally posted by antongould View Post
                        my suspicion, maybe unfounded and unfair, is that if TTN ran live from 05:30 to 12:00 a lot of the people who attack the morning output wouldn’t listen, given the size of their CD collections and streaming services ......
                        I'll take that as a "no", then.
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • Andy Freude

                          Originally posted by antongould View Post
                          At the risk of being even more breathtakingly unfair I would comment as follows ...

                          The bridge that used to be there on R2 a couple of decades ago is now totally gone and, as has been said on another thread, the station has become almost totally 80s/90s pop .......
                          Do you not blush at coming out with same old chestnut "No one else is doing it, so let's have it on Radio 3"?

                          Originally posted by antongould View Post
                          For people who wish to listen to the old style R3 the facility to download TTN is easily available
                          Yes, never mind the shared experience of listening to radio, you lot can listen to the On Demand service on your computers. Just leave us alone to listen to Radio 3.

                          Originally posted by antongould View Post
                          I do find myself educated by the morning output, often by the much hated Playlister Challenge
                          I take everything I've said back and humbly apologise. The morning output suits you - I will crawl back into my hole apologising to you for being so selfish.

                          Originally posted by antongould View Post
                          As to CFM and Scala being available bridges ..... I think I am not alone in hating the intrusion of constantly repeated advertisements .... further as someone pointed out their playlists are hardly inspiring .......
                          Yes, very unreasonable of me to suggest you should have to put up with hated advertisements. Must be as tiresome as listening to presenter inanities … oops! sorry pardon again.

                          Comment

                          • oddoneout
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2015
                            • 9141

                            Originally posted by Andrew Slater View Post
                            Fuller BBC version here (I haven't read it yet, but suspect it'll add fuel to the fire ).
                            What did catch my eye - and not in a good way - was this gem
                            In a celebration of extraordinary female creativity,
                            . My mind immediately went to Dr Johnson's "Sir, a woman's preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all." 'Extraordinary' was so not the right word, as they say.

                            Comment

                            • antongould
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 8778

                              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                              I'll take that as a "no", then.
                              I presume you learned this tactic at the Spennymoor Men’s Club Thursday Debates - pinch your opponent’s question and tell him how he has answered it .....

                              Comment

                              • antongould
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 8778

                                Originally posted by Andy Freude View Post
                                Do you not blush at coming out with same old chestnut "No one else is doing it, so let's have it on Radio 3"?



                                Yes, never mind the shared experience of listening to radio, you lot can listen to the On Demand service on your computers. Just leave us alone to listen to Radio 3.



                                I take everything I've said back and humbly apologise. The morning output suits you - I will crawl back into my hole apologising to you for being so selfish.



                                Yes, very unreasonable of me to suggest you should have to put up with hated advertisements. Must be as tiresome as listening to presenter inanities … oops! sorry pardon again.
                                Apologies gracefully accepted ........

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X