It may be the case that Radio 3 is not trying to attract 'younger' listeners, which leads me to wonder what will happen when its 27 remaining listeners have a combined age of, let's say, 2500.
The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
Yes - but I think its reduction demonstrates that the idea that R3 is trying to attract a "younger" listener doesn't hold water. I'm not at all sure what kind of audience the Beeb imagines is suitable for R3 (beyond the "mythical/semi-mythical" one that I mentioned) - as I find myself attracted to less and less on the station, he policy often seems to me (in my no-doubt paranoid, elitist manner) to be "make the listener ratings so tiny that we can justify getting rid of it completely".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Stanfordian View PostI only very rarely listen to R3 and when I do it's for Record Review which I occasionally hear on listen again. I can't stand the trails, the lack of basic preparation, the bleeding chunks and the silly tweeting games etc. I tend to use my own collection now for classical music and opera. The radio I listen to is Talk Sport, Radio 4 for current affairs, sometimes CFM, Jazz FM in the evening and more recently Bru Zane Classical Radio.
Comment
-
-
Last time I knew anything the average age of the LJ audience was 53, not vastly younger than the average R3 listener. So. What I speculate is a slightly changed strategy to gain younger listeners for something closer to “classical” music than LJ - which has succeeded in attracting new listeners only to itself. And the daytime programmes haven’t succeeded either. So the late evening slots have presenters like CBH and Elizabeth Alker drafted in.Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostI don't know (or "know of") any "younger" listeners who would be attracted to what's on daytime R3 - nor do the examples of texts and tweets sent in sound to me as if they come from anyone under about 60. The decision to reduce the number of Late Junction broadcasts suggests exactly the opposite approach from that of "luring younger listeners" - instead, it strikes me that some kind of (mythical/semi-mythical?) "older", late middle-aged, middle-class, ClassicFM-type is being imagined by the corporation as the R3 ideal.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostIt is mostly about the careers of those involved. So it’s a new plot, rather than a lost one.
If they really want to attract younger listeners, a cross station collaboration with 6 Music to keep the LJ strand alive and strong might have been a good idea.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostIt may be the case that Radio 3 is not trying to attract 'younger' listeners, which leads me to wonder what will happen when its 27 remaining listeners have a combined age of, let's say, 81000.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostI agree with that ts but I also think that the mix on Radio 2 should be better with a few more interesting bits of music thrown into the constant diet of 80s and later pop - and not always the same old records played over again. Local radio couls play a part in this also whose basic fayre is Radio 2 stuff.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by antongould View PostDon’t worry cloughers we are both in it for the long run .........
Comment
-
-
I switched on this morning, as I drove to catch a train to London. Absolutely brilliant. Intelligent, informative presentation and interesting music. I felt as though I was learning something new, rather than putting up with the usual drivel.
Then I realised. The time was 5.30 a.m. It wasn't the sickening Breakfast programme I thought I was listening to. It was the end of Through the Night. It shows that R3 can still deliver the good when it chooses to.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI switched on this morning, as I drove to catch a train to London. Absolutely brilliant. Intelligent, informative presentation and interesting music. I felt as though I was learning something new, rather than putting up with the usual drivel.
Then I realised. The time was 5.30 a.m. It wasn't the sickening Breakfast programme I thought I was listening to. It was the end of Through the Night. It shows that R3 can still deliver the good when it chooses to.
Comment
-
Comment