The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • smittims
    replied
    Thanks, I found that interesting. I know he's popular here for some, and I've never hidden the fact that I dislike his voice and manner,so this is a welcome move for me, as I don't listen to In Tune but do occasionally hear some of 'Breakfast'.

    I felt he had a straw man when he said 'you have to know the rules before you can enjoy it '. I don't think anyone has said that except to defend dumbing-down. And I think he's quite wrong to say there's no point in playing a 35-minute symphony on 'Breakfast'. He cannot know what 'most people' are doing . Many may indeed want to sit for 35 minutes and listen at that time, elaxing over a coffee before they start their day. So as far as I'm concerned it's goodbye and good riddance and apologies to the Trelwany fan club if I spoilt your breakfast.





    Leave a comment:


  • Pulcinella
    replied
    Petroc's move to In tune:

    The Radio 3 favourite on highbrow v lowbrow, flunking his A-levels and his Cornish roots — including the proper way to have a cream tea

    Leave a comment:


  • Serial_Apologist
    replied
    Originally posted by LMcD View Post

    .. which just happens to an anagram of 'rain'.
    So it is!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • LMcD
    replied
    Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post

    One place where one can always expect shars is Iran.
    .. which just happens to an anagram of 'rain'.

    Leave a comment:


  • Serial_Apologist
    replied
    Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post

    I noticed particularly today - i.e. not for the first time - that we might expect 'shars' later in the day. There is also a new kind of concerto, the 'concerto for vahlin and orchestra'.

    I shall miss him.
    One place where one can always expect shars is Iran.

    Leave a comment:


  • LMcD
    replied
    Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post

    I noticed particularly today - i.e. not for the first time - that we might expect 'shars' later in the day. There is also a new kind of concerto, the 'concerto for vahlin and orchestra'.

    I shall miss him.
    As will I.

    Leave a comment:


  • vinteuil
    replied
    Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post

    I noticed particularly today - i.e. not for the first time - that we might expect 'shars' later in the day. There is also a new kind of concerto, the 'concerto for vahlin and orchestra'.

    .
    ... I blush in self-recognition.

    Muss be orf...

    Leave a comment:


  • vinteuil
    replied
    Originally posted by antongould View Post
    It would be nice to round off his stint with an attempt at Cambois ……
    ... nobbut thee and me, anton

    Leave a comment:


  • kernelbogey
    replied
    Originally posted by antongould View Post

    I was listening kb …… as the Squire’s reign comes to an end it has been interesting to listen, after the weather, to his attempts at certain Northumbrian place names. Yesterday for the first three efforts we had for Bellingham as Bell-ing-ham before on the fourth getting very close to, the correct, Bell-in-jam. It would be nice to round off his stint with an attempt at Cambois ……
    I noticed particularly today - i.e. not for the first time - that we might expect 'shars' later in the day. There is also a new kind of concerto, the 'concerto for vahlin and orchestra'.

    I shall miss him.

    Leave a comment:


  • antongould
    replied
    Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
    Well, we had a complete work (Bach Violin Concerto) before 7 today. Someone's listening....
    I was listening kb …… as the Squire’s reign comes to an end it has been interesting to listen, after the weather, to his attempts at certain Northumbrian place names. Yesterday for the first three efforts we had for Bellingham as Bell-ing-ham before on the fourth getting very close to, the correct, Bell-in-jam. It would be nice to round off his stint with an attempt at Cambois ……

    Leave a comment:


  • kernelbogey
    replied
    Well, we had a complete work (Bach Violin Concerto) before 7 today. Someone's listening....

    Leave a comment:


  • oddoneout
    replied
    Originally posted by cloughie View Post

    Doesn’t mean a thing to me - I was recently quite surprised to see porridge on the list of junk foods - I can’t think why organic oats, water and a smidgen of salt for the cooking of it in the microwave with a squirt of honey and a little skimmed milk would be deemed to transgress the ‘not good for you’ boundaries.
    9 Health Benefits of Eating Oats and Oatmeal
    They were wheat flakes, nice flavour and texture, especially when cereal for us normally meant economy cornflakes.
    The issue with porridge is that food manufacturers have hi-jacked an innocent and healthy item to churn out versions that are less healthy because of the added ingredients. In the overall scheme of things they are probably still preferable to the likes of cornflakes and rice cereal as the base is (mostly) whole grain, but better still would be the traditional oats and liquid cooked, with optional(and ideally not too much)salt, sweetening etc. - in other words what most of us would recognise as porridge. Instant porridge that is just the grain, without added sugar/salt wouldn't be included in the junk food list, even though it is more processed than 'proper' porridge.

    Leave a comment:


  • LMcD
    replied
    Originally posted by cloughie View Post

    Yes - crazy isn’t it - I guess it takes no longer to prep from raw ingredients (5 mins ) for something much healthier and probably tasting better.
    I thought junk food was eaten exclusively on flat-bottomed sailing vessels in the Far East.

    Leave a comment:


  • cloughie
    replied
    Originally posted by french frank View Post

    I think it only rates as 'junk' if it contains additives - sugar, salt, preservatives, flavourings &c. These would be branded products rated as ultraprocessed. Just the raw ingredients are fine.
    Yes - crazy isn’t it - I guess it takes no longer to prep from raw ingredients (5 mins ) for something much healthier and probably tasting better.

    Leave a comment:


  • french frank
    replied
    Originally posted by cloughie View Post
    Doesn’t mean a thing to me - I was recently quite surprised to see porridge on the list of junk foods
    I think it only rates as 'junk' if it contains additives - sugar, salt, preservatives, flavourings &c. These would be branded products rated as ultraprocessed. Just the raw ingredients are fine.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X