Simon appears to believe in a ranking of activities and causes. Whichever one heads the list must get all the attention and resources. We don't know if the starving children of Africa or India are at the top of his list. By his own principles it must surely follow that writing notes to this board and indulging in seemingly pointless exchanges trumps the starving children, unless of course Simon is a hypocrite, and doesn't act according to the principles he appears to espouse.
Others seem more capable of workiing with a fuzzier kind of logic (not perhaps fuzzy logic) in which some sort of proportional effort is allocated to different causes. This opens up the possibility of acting to support more than one cause, allbeit perhaps to a lesser extent. If we take Simon's reasoning to the extreme we could infer that he spends all his time and effort working for the children he has claimed support for. I suspect he doesn't.
Others seem more capable of workiing with a fuzzier kind of logic (not perhaps fuzzy logic) in which some sort of proportional effort is allocated to different causes. This opens up the possibility of acting to support more than one cause, allbeit perhaps to a lesser extent. If we take Simon's reasoning to the extreme we could infer that he spends all his time and effort working for the children he has claimed support for. I suspect he doesn't.
Comment