OK, put like that, I see what you mean.
Conquering Wagner.
Collapse
X
-
Thanks. It doesn't help, as you said, that directors all too frequently portray Siegfried as a heavy-handed bully and Mime as a cuddly, harmless, downtrodden old thing. And it also doesn't help, of course, that it's hardly ever possible to cast Siegfried convincingly: put the average aging burly heldentenor up against the average character tenor and the misconception's already more than halfway established.
Comment
-
-
The recent ENO production had a splendid Siegried (and to my shame I can't recall his name) who played the character as a totally convincing teenager, sullen, happy, energetic, lazy, depressed, lost, the lot. And he was up against a wholly malevolent Mime. I didn't care for that Ring as a whole, but those two portrayals were spot on.
I don't think you can say that Siegfried's parentage had any undesirable effects: I suspect that the bad points about your Mum and Dad being brother and sister are rather overshadowed by the good things arising from them both being half-god...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bert Coules View PostIs there any Wagner lover who wouldn't want to see the premiere of the Ring?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bert Coules View PostMime is a calculating opportunist thief and liar, who sees Siegfried as a means to an end, no more,
Re. the portrayal of Siegfried - Scottish Opera's Siegfried was also excellent; a grumpy teenager who thought he knew everything.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bert Coules View PostThe recent ENO production had a splendid Siegried (and to my shame I can't recall his name) who played the character as a totally convincing teenager, sullen, happy, energetic, lazy, depressed, lost, the lot. And he was up against a wholly malevolent Mime. I didn't care for that Ring as a whole, but those two portrayals were spot on.
I don't think you can say that Siegfried's parentage had any undesirable effects: I suspect that the bad points about your Mum and Dad being brother and sister are rather overshadowed by the good things arising from them both being half-god...
Comment
-
-
A fair point about Wotan: no-one in the Ring is entirely black or white. But Siegmund appears to feel nothing but love for the man who raised him, never suspecting that ulterior motives were involved, or that his childhood was anything other than affectionate and nurturing; the exact opposite is true of Siegfried.
I looked him up: ENO's Siegfried was Richard Berkeley-Steele.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostWell, yes, but then hasn't Wotan done just the same? Wotan has essentially 'created' Siegfried to be the hero who recovers the ring & returns it to the Rhine - suppopsedly acting of his own will , but in reality doing what Wotan wants. Of course, it all goes wrong.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bert Coules View PostA fair point about Wotan: no-one in the Ring is entirely black or white. But Siegmund appears to feel nothing but love for the man who raised him, never suspecting that ulterior motives were involved, or that his childhood was anything other than affectionate and nurturing; the exact opposite is true of Siegfried.
I looked him up: ENO's Siegfried was Richard Berkeley-Steele.
But despite that, Siegmund & Sieglinde were still Wotan's proxies - the first stage in bringing about the being who could do what Wotan could not.
Comment
-
-
Yes, but apart from the question of natural fatherhood, the Siegmund/Wotan and Siegfried/Mime situations are exact parallels. The child in each case was raised with one end in view, and it was the same end - if Fricka hadn't intervened, it would have been Siegmund, not his son, who fought Fafner and regained the Ring. So the fact that the two childhoods were so markedly different is significant. Siegfried, after all, took a very long time before he found out for sure that Mime wasn't his father, so you can't ascribe his feelings of hatred toward him to a lack of natural filial affection.Last edited by Bert Coules; 03-01-11, 20:19.
Comment
-
-
Mandryka
Originally posted by Ferretfancy View PostOf course there should always be a horse, if only because there are no real laughs in the Ring until Siegfried makes his little mistake on meeting Brunnhilde for the first time. I suppose the appearance of the toad in Rheingold might also raise a smile.
One of the better things about Tony Palmer's otherwise indigestible Wagner film of 1983 is the recreation of the opening of Rheingold: you could almost believe you were there! Yes, of course we'd all have loved to be have been at Bayreuth in the summer of 1876.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mandryka View PostIn the Goodall Ring, you can hear the audience laughter at those 'strategic' moments in Rheingold and Siegfried (when Siegfried tries out his horn...).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bert Coules View PostThe power of opera in English! I have never heard an audience react in any way to the line "Das tönt nicht recht", but Siegfried's rueful, self-mocking "Well, that's not right" always got a lovely affectionate laugh at the Coli.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThe truth is, I suspect, that for much of the time, the audience has only a vague idea of what is going on when the language is not English.
There may well be surtitles, but who really wants to watch them?
Comment
-
Comment