ROH Rusalka - any feedback?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • alywin
    Full Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 374

    ROH Rusalka - any feedback?

    What it says in the title, basically.
  • Pulcinella
    Host
    • Feb 2014
    • 10872

    #2
    Times review from last Thursday:

    ★★★☆☆I doubt that Dvorak intended his finest opera to be an earnest parable about mankind’s pollution of rivers and lakes. Yet that interpretation is not incomp

    Comment

    • LHC
      Full Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 1554

      #3
      I'm going on Thursday.

      The Guardian reviewer liked it:

      Ann Yee and Natalie Abrahami’s thoughtful and effective new production shapes Dvorák’s opera into a tale of mankind versus nature. A first-rate cast is matched by Semyon Bychkov in the pit
      "I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square."
      Lady Bracknell The importance of Being Earnest

      Comment

      • Simon B
        Full Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 779

        #4
        Exceptional, luminous orchestral playing, even by the often high current standards of the ROH orchestra. It triggered the "How is it that certain conductors can do this?" thought. Bychkov clearly loves this music.

        The production was visually arresting initially, but that started to wear off over the considerable length of the piece. The lighting was a noticeable exception - in a good way.

        Dramatically it sagged in the middle for me - but this seems more the fault of the work. It's not a nailbiter at any point, but that's not the nature of it. It seems more a series of tableaux and set pieces.

        Consistently excellent singing.

        Had it been less well played and sung it might have been slightly hard work overall, straying as it does into sub-Wagner at times, but the musical excellence carried it.

        PS - If you're seated (or stood as in my case) on the sides, an awful lot of the "action" takes place stage-right and some way back, so expect to not be able to see who's singing for quite a lot of the time!

        Comment

        • Pulcinella
          Host
          • Feb 2014
          • 10872

          #5
          Originally posted by Simon B View Post
          ...
          PS - If you're seated (or stood as in my case) on the sides, an awful lot of the "action" takes place stage-right and some way back, so expect to not be able to see who's singing for quite a lot of the time!
          A comment worthy of the Stage design thread: we don't all sit in the stalls.

          Mind you, the architect of the swimming/diving arena (or whatever it is) at the London Olympics won awards, but several people there couldn't see what was going on either!

          Comment

          • Ein Heldenleben
            Full Member
            • Apr 2014
            • 6726

            #6
            Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
            A comment worthy of the Stage design thread: we don't all sit in the stalls.

            Mind you, the architect of the swimming/diving arena (or whatever it is) at the London Olympics won awards, but several people there couldn't see what was going on either!
            A real problem in Italian Opera houses . I once sat Balcony right for a performance of Tristan . With few tickets left my companions were lower slips left. The entire Act 2 love duet was set stage left . They saw none of it.

            Comment

            • alywin
              Full Member
              • Apr 2011
              • 374

              #7
              Thanks for the reviews. One of those ROH productions which is squeezed into such a small gap in the calendar that I probably won't have time to go anyway. Maybe just as well, as I'm not sure I fancy standing for 4 hours - 3 hours of Sleeping Beauty was more than enough for me.

              Comment

              Working...
              X