Puts' 'The Hours' (Met)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Master Jacques
    Full Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 1953

    Puts' 'The Hours' (Met)

    Somebody just had an unkind idea at the end of tonight's live relay from the Met.

    Evidently thinking that listeners needed a pick-me-up after enduring a very long evening of maudlin, pretentious soap opera strong on self-righteous sentimentality but weak on musical personality - and this, despite the diva-rich cast, stupendous playing and conducting, and evidently high production values.

    The unkind idea: a naughty programmer chose to fill the gap to the next programme with some more opera (sigh...), but in three minutes Lisette Oropesa's simple singing of Verdi's 'Addio, del passato' delivered more emotional and dramatic power than Kevin Puts had managed in three hours.

    (Acclaimed though The Hours was by standing ovation, "memorable triumph", "exquisite masterpiece beyond compare" and all that, of course. The film of the book had been rescued by Philip Glass's music. This operatic version had no such luck.)
  • Ein Heldenleben
    Full Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 6962

    #2
    Originally posted by Master Jacques View Post
    Somebody just had an unkind idea at the end of tonight's live relay from the Met.

    Evidently thinking that listeners needed a pick-me-up after enduring a very long evening of maudlin, pretentious soap opera strong on self-righteous sentimentality but weak on musical personality - and this, despite the diva-rich cast, stupendous playing and conducting, and evidently high production values.

    The unkind idea: a naughty programmer chose to fill the gap to the next programme with some more opera (sigh...), but in three minutes Lisette Oropesa's simple singing of Verdi's 'Addio, del passato' delivered more emotional and dramatic power than Kevin Puts had managed in three hours.

    (Acclaimed though The Hours was by standing ovation, "memorable triumph", "exquisite masterpiece beyond compare" and all that, of course. The film of the book had been rescued by Philip Glass's music. This operatic version had no such luck.)
    Yes well thing is Verdi was a genius . Listened for half an hour and couldn’t believe how poor the music was. The only saving grace was that the England match stopped me from going to the cinema to watch it. Mind you now I wish I had,..
    How can so many talented people think this was worth their effort ( the opera not the footy ) ?

    Comment

    • Bryn
      Banned
      • Mar 2007
      • 24688

      #3
      Thanks, MJ, for saving me the bother of listening via Sounds. I was not that taken with Glass's contribution to the film but think I can see what you mean, nonetheless.

      Comment

      • smittims
        Full Member
        • Aug 2022
        • 4384

        #4
        Perhaps this was an occasion when 'you had to be there'.

        The Difference between what you say about the opera and what they said reminds me of Benny Green years ago on 'Stop the Week':

        Unkown: But this woman's books have brought pleasure to millions!

        Green: Yes, but that doesn't mean they're any good.

        Comment

        • kernelbogey
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 5807

          #5
          Originally posted by Master Jacques View Post
          Somebody just had an unkind idea at the end of tonight's live relay from the Met.
          Thank you, MJ, for this witty OP!

          Without having looked at any schedule to see what was on, I turned the radio on, mid-Act, while prepping supper: but turned it off for the same reasons:
          'Addio, del passato' delivered more emotional and dramatic power than Kevin Puts had managed in three hours.
          Althoiugh by no mean a fan of contemporary opera, I hope that I am not bigotted, but I immediately found it thoroughly dull -- although not without a twinge of guilt that perhaps I should be listening to this....

          Comment

          • DracoM
            Host
            • Mar 2007
            • 12993

            #6
            IMO utter drivel - a real blot on Met's books.
            Last edited by DracoM; 11-12-22, 20:25.

            Comment

            • Frances_iom
              Full Member
              • Mar 2007
              • 2418

              #7
              It probably ticked all the right boxes - catch is the masters of old had a tough education in what worked with many failures en route to well earned success - there were of course many more smaller houses in which to hone skills.
              But yes I too tuned in but not for long - mostly I tend to avoid Met offerings and don't think much of the sound quality.

              Comment

              Working...
              X