Originally posted by kuligin
View Post
The end of ENO?
Collapse
X
-
-
-
This is really the last rights for opera outside London. ON were dying anyway, as anyone who saw their Alcina will know, all spin and no substance, an Opera company who don’t do Opera. They presumably now won’t come to Manchester, that saves some money and ENO will do a little Puccini and musicals based in Birmingham or Manchester.
I went to the RNCM last night for the first time since COVID, they now do few classical music performances, the Opera school is a shadow of what it was. The Mahler they played was deeply disappointing, not only as a performance lit up only by a superb first oboe, but by a trivial speech from the Director of Communications about how wonderful the performance would be, no programme, the student audience apathetic, on their phones, wandering in and out. It was like going to a seminary were the students do not believe in God.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Frances_iom View Postbut isn't this inherent in that digital (requiring nothing other than to switch on) inherently attracts lamebrains who just as easily switch off when some effort is needed - hence the only successful digital offering (arty or otherwise) is junk food for the masses - nothing worthwhile is ever gained without effort thus whilst digital does indeed enable easy access, it cannot enable easy understanding and appreciation.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post...
I could make your eyes water with how public money has been wasted on lamebrain arty digital initiatives over the decades.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostStuart Murphy has been a complete waste of space at ENO, pushing sentimental and naff populist policies of the worst order, with no idea about how to run something that wasn't geared to mass media. I think people are waking up to what's just been done to the English/Welsh opera network (or what's left of it after Covid). It needed much more money, not assassination.
I hear (on R4 Today this morning) that £1M per annum for 3 years guaranteed of ENO's money has gone to a marketing community project group in Wakefield, whose CEO (on a fat salary) proudly announced that getting a small audience of mixed able and disabled people to wave their hands in the air in rhythm together was a great and inclusive artistic achievement. Well worth the money, I am sure.
I could make your eyes water with how public money has been wasted on lamebrain arty digital initiatives over the decades.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostIt’s nonsensical if you are in the far South West. GTO stopped touring here 4 years ago. So we’ll have gone from3 x 4-5 days of quality opera to none in about 5 years (WNO do two visits ) . I don’t count ETO as, worthy thought they are, it’s just a bit too small scale. Meanwhile ENO look set to be clashing with ON up North. Stuart Murphy might have been an excellent TV exec but I’m not sure he really had the political skills or connections to be honest.
I hear (on R4 Today this morning) that £1M per annum for 3 years guaranteed of ENO's money has gone to a marketing community project group in Wakefield, whose CEO (on a fat salary) proudly announced that getting a small audience of mixed able and disabled people to wave their hands in the air in rhythm together was a great and inclusive artistic achievement. Well worth the money, I am sure.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostWell done you. If enough people do it, we never know how the weight of public reaction might play out. At the very least, it's important to let such people know that their timeserving blandishments have not passed muster with quite everyone!
In this case, I believe that representations are already being made about ENO, to go above the Arts Council's heads. The trouble is, that ENO's management have been their own worst enemy: the current Chief Executive is a shocker, and is already pre-booked to be the first rat off this sinking ship.
The English National Opera (ENO) announces that Stuart Murphy, current Chief Executive of the ENO and London Coliseum, will leave the company in September 2023.
Norman Lebrecht, 2019: "Murphy makes his predecessors seem reasoned and adept. He maintains you don’t have to know anything about opera in order to run an opera house. The damage of his thoughtless actions is already evident and the consequences may be lasting". Prophetic words.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostI’ve done so but it’s utterly pointless
In this case, I believe that representations are already being made about ENO, to go above the Arts Council's heads. The trouble is, that ENO's management have been their own worst enemy: the current Chief Executive is a shocker, and is already pre-booked to be the first rat off this sinking ship.
The English National Opera (ENO) announces that Stuart Murphy, current Chief Executive of the ENO and London Coliseum, will leave the company in September 2023.
Norman Lebrecht, 2019: "Murphy makes his predecessors seem reasoned and adept. He maintains you don’t have to know anything about opera in order to run an opera house. The damage of his thoughtless actions is already evident and the consequences may be lasting". Prophetic words.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostAnybody who would like to write to Sir Nicholas Serota at the Arts Council, maybe to suggest his immediate resignation (as I've just done), could use this form:
https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/conta...tomer-services
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Simon B View PostNot being privy to the internal details this may be back-to-front of course. Touring may be financially counterproductive for WNO and ON at the moment. They do it because it's part of what they're for.
There was a paradox during the COVID lockdowns where the financial impact on organisations which raised a large proportion of their income from box office, private largesse and other commercial activity (like the Royal Opera House at 75% ish) was much greater than on those who were already heavily dependent on subsidy - like ENO/WNO/ON who if I recall right only got about 1/3 of pre-Covid income from box office etc.
For the latter, each touring performance you put on might end up costing you more money than if you just paid everyone to do nothing for the night, all other things being equal.
Ultimately though, what's the point in an opera company being subsidised to do not that much opera? That's the position ENO ended up in, with the sad consequences we now see...
I always felt that, intentionally or otherwise, that lockdowns were a great way of softening up an arts sector that might generally be a source of opposition to govt policy, and a source of radical thinking.
A small , elite publicly funded sector which has to go cap in hand every three years, boxes duly ticked,isn’t going to be saying very challenging things to those in power, and that situation is likely much worse than three years ago.Last edited by teamsaint; 04-11-22, 20:54.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostRemember that it was Nadine Dorries put the screws on the Arts Council for this destruction. She is very embodiment - if not of class envy, then of intellect envy. And if he had an ounce of decency Sir N. Serota would resign, and hand back his knighthood while he's about it. A hundred years to build up our arts structure, frail as it is. And now... much of it emasculated or killed by these time-serving charlatans in one day.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Simon B View PostNot being privy to the internal details this may be back-to-front of course. Touring may be financially counterproductive for WNO and ON at the moment. They do it because it's part of what they're for.
There was a paradox during the COVID lockdowns where the financial impact on organisations which raised a large proportion of their income from box office, private largesse and other commercial activity (like the Royal Opera House at 75% ish) was much greater than on those who were already heavily dependent on subsidy - like ENO/WNO/ON who if I recall right only got about 1/3 of pre-Covid income from box office etc.
For the latter, each touring performance you put on might end up costing you more money than if you just paid everyone to do nothing for the night, all other things being equal.
Ultimately though, what's the point in an opera company being subsidised to do not that much opera? That's the position ENO ended up in, with the sad consequences we now see...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostWhat do you mean. . the Tories don’t like what they perceive to be opera loving toffs ( or in my case middle class former public sector workers )?
Weirdly and rather wonderfully the Huddersfield contemporary music festival has its budget bumped up…
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostDidn’t realise they did so few CF perfs. In essence they are a touring company :
so how does it work with GTO, ETO, ON , WNO and now possibly ENO all on tour?
This just hasn’t been thought through has it?
Good theatre the millennium - probably my fave opera house .
There was a paradox during the COVID lockdowns where the financial impact on organisations which raised a large proportion of their income from box office, private largesse and other commercial activity (like the Royal Opera House at 75% ish) was much greater than on those who were already heavily dependent on subsidy - like ENO/WNO/ON who if I recall right only got about 1/3 of pre-Covid income from box office etc.
For the latter, each touring performance you put on might end up costing you more money than if you just paid everyone to do nothing for the night, all other things being equal.
Ultimately though, what's the point in an opera company being subsidised to do not that much opera? That's the position ENO ended up in, with the sad consequences we now see...
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: