Met - Adriana Lecouvreur (Netrebko)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dave2002
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 17947

    #16
    Very strange - and trying to work it out from the plot synopsis beforehand was next to impossible. In the end it was really good, and the plot almost made sense.
    Not sure how Adriana was able to sing so loudly before the poison finally took hold, nor why nobody else died from contact with it, but that's opera, I guess.

    Comment

    • Ein Heldenleben
      Full Member
      • Apr 2014
      • 6579

      #17
      I don't think you look to AL for narrative logic . I asked my wife why Maurizio doesn't die after kissing AL who has kissed the poisoned violets .." Maybe she inhaled the poison" ...

      Comment

      • verismissimo
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 2957

        #18
        Really it's operatic tosh of the verismo variety, a vehicle for two divas and a divo. They certainly delivered the goods in a production by David McVicar that seemed to have sprung fully formed from an earlier era.

        If it had been composed by Puccini, he would have made the plot seem less tangled, the motivations more clear. And there was an irritating one second gap between sound and picture throughout - the fault of the Phoenix or the Met?

        Comment

        • Ein Heldenleben
          Full Member
          • Apr 2014
          • 6579

          #19
          The synchronisation was fine in the cinema I was in so it was either a local problem or a problem in distribution . I think last night confirmed my feelings after watching Cav and Pag - Puccini is head and shoulders above the rest of the verismo field.

          Comment

          • Dave2002
            Full Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 17947

            #20
            No significant synchronisation problems where we went. Complain to the cinema management. I enjoyed it - but I can't remember a single "tune"!

            There were some particular level discrepancies in the scene where some of the cast (much lower valume levels) were rearranging furniture and props in the theatre within the theatre - and then the main protagonists took over again.

            I also wondered whether the sound quality was as good in the live version as in some of the trailers for future productions. Presumably the trailers can be done without an audience - probably at rehearsals, and the sound can be optimised. In the live presentations the sound is sometimes far too loud, and not always very refined - though again that may depend on the particular venue.

            Comment

            • Conchis
              Banned
              • Jun 2014
              • 2396

              #21
              A rubbishy piece, sheer Italian junk food, but it can come up trumps with the right production and the right singers.

              I saw the premiere of the Covent Garden McVicar production with a(n unusually on form) Gheorghiu and Kaufmann back in 2010. It was marvellous.

              Comment

              • Dave2002
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 17947

                #22
                Originally posted by verismissimo View Post
                Really it's operatic tosh of the verismo variety, a vehicle for two divas and a divo. They certainly delivered the goods in a production by David McVicar that seemed to have sprung fully formed from an earlier era.
                Divo is a word which I've not really heard used before last night. Yes - it does mean a male opera star.

                Also what sounded like bocca di lupo, but was perhaps this "in bocca al lupo" which seems to be the Italian equivalent of "break a leg".

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_bocca_al_lupo Into the mouth of the wolf

                The response Crepi il lupo! - may the wolf die, or shortened to just Crepi! - https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/crepi_il_lupo

                These phrases were new to me. It was amusing that one of the three Italian performers interviewed either couldn't speak English, or didn't want to. One might have imagined that could have been checked beforehand, but we understood enough of what he said to find that funny. His performance (Michonnet) was very enjoyable and one of the best.

                Comment

                • Constantbee
                  Full Member
                  • Jul 2017
                  • 504

                  #23
                  If you didn't hear it, the interval quiz was fun. Contestants were invited to rank the efficacy of famous operatic poison doses in terms of the length of time they took to act. Not as easy as you might think, but some impressive answers were received
                  And the tune ends too soon for us all

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X