Perhaps I shouldn't comment - but there is a review of the ENO performance here - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opera/wha...liseum-review/
Some of it was very good, in particular the orchestra played as well as I've heard them recently. Although Wigglesworth seems to flail around more than Gardner, who appears to be more precise in his baton wielding, the results were still good. I often wonder whether having a good baton technique really is that important - I suspect a really good conductor will get results anyway, though perhaps having a good stick technique does sometimes make a difference. Also, I believe that some orchestras (maybe particularly American ones) believe in SOPs (standard operational procedures) so that they are clued up to "standard" codings, and get thrown by people who come in with other "methods".
I have won't comment further until the end of the series - there is a slight hint in the Telegraph review, and perhaps anyone else who follows this and comments here should also do likewise.
Some of it was very good, in particular the orchestra played as well as I've heard them recently. Although Wigglesworth seems to flail around more than Gardner, who appears to be more precise in his baton wielding, the results were still good. I often wonder whether having a good baton technique really is that important - I suspect a really good conductor will get results anyway, though perhaps having a good stick technique does sometimes make a difference. Also, I believe that some orchestras (maybe particularly American ones) believe in SOPs (standard operational procedures) so that they are clued up to "standard" codings, and get thrown by people who come in with other "methods".
I have won't comment further until the end of the series - there is a slight hint in the Telegraph review, and perhaps anyone else who follows this and comments here should also do likewise.
Comment