If you saw it in the cinema, you'll have had the added bonus of an interview with Simon Biazeck, who was singing in the chorus - which is one of the glories of the production; well sung, and remarkably well acted.
ROH 'William Tell'
Collapse
X
-
Simon Biazeck
Originally posted by jean View PostIf you saw it in the cinema, you'll have had the added bonus of an interview with Simon Biazeck, who was singing in the chorus - which is one of the glories of the production; well sung, and remarkably well acted.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Biazeck View Post...I think the most stressful thing was having to do the clean up (so much blood!)...
That, and the appearance of the ghost of the elder Melchtal, which reminded me of nothing so much as hammy productions of Macbeth where Banquo's ghost really does shake his gory locks art the audience.
But these are minor objections.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostI have to say that all that blood-smearing was one of the things I had reservations about, especially as the production seemed to be set during WWII (rather than the Bosnian conflict, as was suggested earlier in this thread).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostWere they really all wearing those Fair Isle knitted waistcoats in Bosnia in the 1990s?
"Nous somme enveloppait par a mode terrible envoyé à partir d'une équitable île"
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Prommer View PostYes, I do understand what a Messageboard is for, but some are now just repeating themselves endlessly in a futile quest to have the last word!
there isn't a "last word" to have
and there is much to explore
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostI don't see anyone repeating themselves much
there isn't a "last word" to have
and there is much to explore
I was listening to a performance of the Franck Violin Sonata recently which was given what felt like a very jazz/blues type treatment, and I found myself wondering if this was really in line with the composers intention. Or how he would have responded to it. or how he would have responded had he lived another 50 years. or if it matters.or if I really knew the piece well enough to even bother asking the question.
Dub would be an interesting area for discussion too.
Dub Franck. Now I would give THAT a spin !
but seriously off topic.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostInteresting
So to what degree do people feel that the composers intentions are sacrosanct?
I heard a paper a couple of weeks ago at a conference where it is possible to demonstrate (and convincingly measure) whether there are elements in musical composition that are really there but the composer has no awareness of their presence. This was talking mostly about underlying rhythmic structures in music which was intended to be without pulse but I think it applies to other elements as well.
(and what Cage said about Indeterminancy)
I don't think it moves my 'analogy' away at all
someone was complaining that
(i'm not going to post a link to the terrible Cliff Richard song with the title of the play with a bear )
Edit: some interesting thoughts here
Is there a single right interpretation for such cultural phenomena as works of literature, visual artworks, works of music, the self, and legal and sacred texts? In these essays, almost all written especially for this volume, twenty leading philosophers pursue different answers to this question by examining the nature of interpretation and its objects and ideals. The fundamental conflict between positions that universally require the ideal of a single admissible interpretation (singularism) and those that allow a multiplicity of some admissible interpretations (multiplism) leads to a host of engrossing questions explored in these essays: Does multiplism invite interpretive anarchy? Can opposing interpretations be jointly defended? Should competition between contending interpretations be understood in terms of (bivalent) truth or (multivalent) reasonableness, appropriateness, aptness, or the like? Is interpretation itself an essentially contested concept? Does interpretive activity seek truth or aim at something else as well? Should one focus on interpretive acts rather than interpretations? Should admissible interpretations be fixed by locating intentions of a historical or hypothetical creator, or neither? What bearing does the fact of the historical situatedness of cultural entities have on their identities? The contributors are Annette Barnes, Noël Carroll, Stephen Davies, Susan Feagin, Alan Goldman, Charles Guignon, Chhanda Gupta, Garry Hagberg, Michael Krausz, Peter Lamarque, Jerrold Levinson, Joseph Margolis, Rex Martin, Jitendra Mohanty, David Novitz, Philip Percival, Torsten Pettersson, Robert Stecker, Laurent Stern, and Paul Thom.
and on P241 touching on the role of the listener , and what audience bring to a performance.Last edited by teamsaint; 06-07-15, 17:00.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
Comment