How do people feel about the tendency of Producers to stretch to incredible lengths to try to update the plots to make them appear contemporary? Regietheater is one term for this. Most critics in the States routinely refer to this practice as "Eurotrash".
But isn't all opera twaddle? I was asked.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostLa Donna del Lago surely must be a front runner in the twaddle stakes .Last edited by David-G; 07-05-14, 00:27.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostHow do people feel about the tendency of Producers to stretch to incredible lengths to try to update the plots to make them appear contemporary? Regietheater is one term for this. Most critics in the States routinely refer to this practice as "Eurotrash".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mary Chambers View PostMy own early opera experience went like this (apologies to those who've heard all this before): age 11, Britten's Let's Make an Opera, which explains the conventions for children. Not converted. Age about 15, Humperdinck's Hansel and Gretel at school. Besotted. 22 or so - Gounod, Faust in Amsterdam. It's a marvel I ever went to another opera. Very bad performance, I suspect, and total twaddle as far as I was concerned then. Later the same year, Peter Grimes. Totally converted!
Some wise person once said that some opera is mainly about singing, and some is mainly about drama. I go for drama and meaning.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostHow do people feel about the tendency of Producers to stretch to incredible lengths to try to update the plots to make them appear contemporary? Regietheater is one term for this. Most critics in the States routinely refer to this practice as "Eurotrash".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aeolium View PostNo, I was saying that it was the music - the breaking into song - that redeemed stories which in some cases, not all, range from the unconvincing to the absurd. There are also stories rich in symbolism and operas with poetic or witty libretti including works based on great works of literature. But I think there are quite a few where the plot and the libretto are pretty weak, where producers vainly try to assign coherence and significance but where in reality the structure is just a prop for a series of musical set pieces.
It still seems to me to be unfamiliarity with the genre or non-acceptance of its function if, purely on the basis of the narrative, it's described as twaddle. Perhaps I object because it's no more than a subjective opinion anyway. I was talking to someone yesterday who said he was completely non-musical and never listened to music. Non-comprehension of one speaker only makes his pronouncements relevant to him personally. I'm only being pedantic in saying that: "As far as I'm concerned, all opera/this opera is twaddle" is a statement which can't be objected to, whereas: "All opera is twaddle" can. And even those who say "Some opera is twaddle" might not agree on which ones are.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
At the risk of displaying, once again, my pedantry, here is the OED definition of twaddle:
Senseless, silly, or trifling talk or writing; empty verbosity; dull and trashy statement or discourse; empty commonplace; prosy nonsense.
However absurd the plot, none of this justly describes opera. As others have implied, this description would also rule out much other art, drama, fairy stories, legends and the like.
But in the case of opera, the music has the capacity to evoke other strong feelings in the audience than those engendered only by the action.
Comment
-
-
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostThough if you say 'unconvincing', it implies that somehow stories have to be true to life, and convince people that the narrative could happen, that it somehow 'true'; and what about absurdiist theatre - is that made 'twaddle' because it clearly not believable when set against real life?
Charles Mackerras once said that he thought Weber's Der Freischütz was essentially unstageable for a modern audience. If scenes like that in the Wolf's Glen were performed "straight" then the audience would laugh, yet if it were performed ironically or surrealistically it would undermine the intentions of the librettist and composer. I don't think I agree with him, and I do think that opera ought to be staged, but his point does illustrate the problem.
I'm only being pedantic in saying that: "As far as I'm concerned, all opera/this opera is twaddle" is a statement which can't be objected to, whereas: "All opera is twaddle" can. And even those who say "Some opera is twaddle" might not agree on which ones are.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aeolium View Post
Charles Mackerras once said that he thought Weber's Der Freischütz was essentially unstageable for a modern audience. If scenes like that in the Wolf's Glen were performed "straight" then the audience would laugh, yet if it were performed ironically or surrealistically it would undermine the intentions of the librettist and composer. I don't think I agree with him, and I do think that opera ought to be staged, but his point does illustrate the problem.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostI think that attitude patronises an audience who are surely sophisticated enough to realise that the historic development of opera requires a suspension of disbelief. It's a view which is also somewhat undermined by the same conductor's championing of Janacek, most of whose operas have significantly fantastic plot strategems - but are none the worse for that.....Interestingly, Gardiner at the semi staged performance of Freischutz felt that the Wolf's Glen had the power to terrify an audience still; and with a little imagination, and "played straight" I would agree. For example, at the Proms, masked members of the cast burst in the auditorium at various points, which gave the prodution great impact.
Call it surrealism or what you will, but an audience is likely to be able to go with an intelligent production of most operas.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostAt the risk of displaying, once again, my pedantry, here is the OED definition of twaddle:
An additional entry adds 'worthless'.
However absurd the plot, none of this justly describes opera. As others have implied, this description would also rule out much other art, drama, fairy stories, legends and the like.
But in the case of opera, the music has the capacity to evoke other strong feelings in the audience than those engendered only by the action.
Deems Taylor, in his preface to Gilbert’s Complete Operas, disagrees with Gilbert’s evaluation of his own work: “Occasionally, in the ballads, he is serious, either in attack or defense, and results are almost invariably unfortunate. Gilbert always affected to regard the Bab Ballads as inconsequential trifles, and was even heard to refer to his operettas as ‘twaddle.’
One person's twaddle is another person's enlightenment - unfortunately in my case, frequently twaddle.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post...an audience who are surely sophisticated enough to realise that the historic development of opera requires a suspension of disbelief...
Comment
-
Comment