Amazing passage that, isn't it? Yet it's simply a varied combination of the opening figures of the finale, the little wavering figure in the 2nd violins and the descending pizzicato in the 1sts. It follows the long cadential passage based on the F Minor Mass Kyrie quotation, after which there's a lengthy development of the lyrical second group, which then takes on a surprisingly important role in the finale. The Mass quote returns to herald the extensive coda which gathers up all these motifs, then finds time to quote the first movement's main theme, the staccato 2+3 rhythmic figure from that movement having already played a motivating role in the finale itself.
It really does all make thrilling sense when you really get to know it. The excision of the second mass quotation in the 1877 text, and other passages (including that bass groundswell at the start of the coda) really do damage the shape of the piece, and do nothing for the listener's grasp of it either...
It really does all make thrilling sense when you really get to know it. The excision of the second mass quotation in the 1877 text, and other passages (including that bass groundswell at the start of the coda) really do damage the shape of the piece, and do nothing for the listener's grasp of it either...
Comment