I always detect a slight sniffiness when critics discuss Sir Georg: that he doesn't quite belong even in the second tier of 'great' conductors (ie, with Karajan, Bernstein, etc - Furtwangler, Toscanni et al being in the first tier).
Perhaps his sheer commercial success is the problem? Allied with his usually extrovert approach to music-making....
Personally, I think he was a reliable and often inspired conductor: a lot of his recordings are ideal for listeners new to a particular work. I'm currently listening to his Chicago Mahler recordings - they may not be the ones I'd want to take to that desert island, but they're strong and solid throughout. He also benefited from working with the very best engineers and producers in the business.
If this sounds like faint praise, it's not meant to be.
What are your thoughts?
Perhaps his sheer commercial success is the problem? Allied with his usually extrovert approach to music-making....
Personally, I think he was a reliable and often inspired conductor: a lot of his recordings are ideal for listeners new to a particular work. I'm currently listening to his Chicago Mahler recordings - they may not be the ones I'd want to take to that desert island, but they're strong and solid throughout. He also benefited from working with the very best engineers and producers in the business.
If this sounds like faint praise, it's not meant to be.
What are your thoughts?
Comment