Strange programming maybe...two pot-boilers preceded by Honegger's Symphonie Liturgique, surely a rarely heard piece. The only Honegger I know is the inevitable Pacific 231 and the slightly rambling Christmas Cantata. So I was keen to hear this. I was not overwhelmed. I find it difficult to buttonhole Honegger's style...perhaps I shouldn't try. It left the overwhelming impression of a film-score from which the film had unfortunately been lost. Does anyone 'get' Honeger? If so, spill all......
Honegger, Rach and Faure from Wales
Collapse
X
-
Sir Monty Golfear
Not sure I get Honegger, but I was listening to it so I could get to hear Yevgeny Sudbin play the Rachmaninov. I find sudbin very compelling listening ....he made an heroic comeback after that very unfortunate memory lapse that seemed to go on for quite a while.Last edited by Guest; 24-01-14, 23:27.
-
Originally posted by ardcarp View PostDoes anyone 'get' Honegger? If so, spill all......
His grave is in Montmartre village cemetery, a plain black marble slab, moving in its simplicity.
Comment
-
-
Honegger's 3rd is great symphony, one of the tragic masterpieces of the wartorn 20th century. I always think of the coda as an attempt to find some kind of peace, as a single bird calls, among the smoking ruins...
But I didn't listen tonight as this programme seemed to be designed less by a committee than a pantomime horse with the head stuck on the wrong end. As so often, too often, with Sibelius 7 (another masterpiece of white-dwarf intensity & compression) you diminish the stature of the Honegger by placing it anywhere but at the end. The final climax is - or should be - devastating, and should leave you, all passion spent, with that Dantescan vision "and that day we read no further..."
Honegger has his roots in the neo-classical but is often very highly charged emotionally, and rhythmically often complex and inventive. His 1st is something of a sighting shot, but still most engaging & highly original, and his symphonies 2-5 are masterpieces of great variety, concision, warmth and intensity. He certainly never wasted a note or repeated himself. 2 & 3 are his "War" symphonies, first truly immortalised by Karajan's famous 1969 recordings. Jansons did them very well in Oslo in 1993, but for complete cycles you have Luisi/Suisse Romande, Baudo/Czech PO, and Dutoit/BRSO. I tend (quite strongly) toward Luisi despite some surprisingly (revelatory) slow tempi and I think his 3rd is extraordinary - certainly the best- (shatteringly well-) recorded (though that opinion has caused some controversy hereabouts!) Baudo is very idiomatic throughout but the sound is a little restricted in the bigger moments. Dutoit is - as ever - accurate, neat and tidy, quite satisfying but lacking that last degree or three of intensity and drama. His Honegger isn't quite as convincing as his Roussel.
Of various single issues, there should be a place on everyone's shelf for Munch and The Lamoureux in No.4 (Erato). It has an effortlessly pastoral beauty and is simply a classic of the Gramophone... (c/w equally superior Dutilleux 2 etc). For 2&5, it's Munch again, this time with the matchless Boston SO of the mid-50s. It is mono, but of such brilliance, virtuosity & intensity that it you'll scarcely notice. If you must have stereo then his Paris Orchestra 2nd on EMI Grocs is not far behind.
With Honegger - as with much else of any depth - the more you listen the more you love. if "Classical Music" (as a style, an artform, an intellectual value) is to survive in this twittering, crisis-chattering world it needs such attentive dedication.Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 26-01-14, 00:35.
Comment
-
-
well for what little it's worth I enjoyed all of last night's concert very much, with the possible exception of the soprano soloist whose intonation I thought was slightly suspect. I've loved the Liturgique for a long time (without knowing too much of its background), with the help of the Karajan recording. AM, I can't agree that the trumpet can be omitted from Symphony 2 - that entry is such a joyous spine-tingling moment for me. I don't really know much else of Honegger's output, I must do some exploring.Last edited by mercia; 25-01-14, 06:47.
Comment
-
-
this programme seemed to be designed less by a committee than a pantomime horse with the head stuck on the wrong end.
With Honegger - as with much else of any depth - the more you listen the more you love.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mercia View PostAM, I can't agree that the trumpet can be omitted from Symphony 2 - that entry is such a joyous spine-tingling moment for me..
I add a recommendation for Ansermet/OSR in No 4.
Comment
-
-
Jayne, where would you place Jarvi and the Danish National Radio Symphony on Chandos with No 3. I am a relative newcomer to Honegger's symphonies although I appear to have had this recording for years without having played it until recently and much liked it. Should I be embarrassed to say that I originally bought the recording for an outstanding Pacific 231 which I love!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LaurieWatt View PostJayne, where would you place Jarvi and the Danish National Radio Symphony on Chandos with No 3. I am a relative newcomer to Honegger's symphonies although I appear to have had this recording for years without having played it until recently and much liked it. Should I be embarrassed to say that I originally bought the recording for an outstanding Pacific 231 which I love!
Comment
-
Comment