What a marvellous concert. The JM Viola was magnificent. Well worth hearing again and I am glad that Cali was at the hall himself!! :) With the Mahler 6, I don't know if I have heard such a more natural performance as I had last night! A great way to finish of a day, by anyone's standards! :)
LPO Jurowski Jan 15 2014
Collapse
X
-
Interesting review from ES here: http://www.edwardseckerson.biz/revie...l-hall-review/"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LaurieWatt View PostI am sure that Andy Barclay (LPO Principal Percussion) will forgive me this quote from a thread on Facebook: "Today's interesting discovery - if you play the hammer in Mahler 6 with a little too much enthusiasm the hammer kicks back at you making you take a step backwards into a pair of 24" cymbals which then fall on the floor but you can't hear them because there are 9 LPO horns in front of you rearranging your internal organs while it happens. Just another day at the office......." It was the concert.... I certainly did not hear it.
and the incident was indeed inaudible and invisible from Row E (although I did see some of the punters in the seats directly behind the hammer grinning - I assumed it was just at the spectacle of the chap wielding his oversized croquet mallet...)Last edited by Nick Armstrong; 16-01-14, 16:06."...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View PostInteresting review from ES here: http://www.edwardseckerson.biz/revie...l-hall-review/
I realise that for some people the order of the 2nd and 3rd movements is a source of endless controversy - something I have never really understood. (I am happy to accept the conductor's interpretative decision.) What I do find intensely annoying is when that preoccupation overwhelms and distorts a critic's perception of a performance.
Comment
-
-
I've heard only the Macmillan via iPlayer. My word what a fine first performance from Lawrence Power beautifuly accompanied by Jurowski and the LPO! But... what of its music? Marry in haste, repent at leisure goes the proverb and Macmillan always produces bewitching pieces scored with the brilliance of Arnold and Bantock and better structured than either of those forebears could manage. Rhythmic energy, tunes galores, gaudy textures ...
I know you're waiting for the ...
BUT...
repeated hearings of other works have shown that they have lacked staying power. The problem is that a facile ear and a quick brain allow Macmillan to absorb the inconsequential from friend and foe alike but there's too little grist, challenge is absent, the need to struggle to understand the new is never there. "These I have Loved" - including a number of my earlier successes for good measure.
BUT...
Macmillan has his merits. He will be the "way-in", the sugar-coated bon-bon that allows the hard kernels of real modern music to be ingested by those who otherwise find them dfficult to swallow.
Let Jimmy have his moments in the sunshine for I fear posterity's judgement on his work will be harsh.
The trouble is every first performance of a Jimmy Mac inhibits a performance of a piece saying something that we need to hear.
It's so easy to "cop out" - I performed one of Jimmy's Strathclyde motets twice with my choir in December - they loved singing it, and the conservative congregations were bowled over!
I'm a miserable sinner - where's the Catholic Church when you need it, Jimmy?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LaurieWatt View PostI am sure that Andy Barclay (LPO Principal Percussion) will forgive me this quote from a thread on Facebook: "Today's interesting discovery - if you play the hammer in Mahler 6 with a little too much enthusiasm the hammer kicks back at you making you take a step backwards into a pair of 24" cymbals which then fall on the floor but you can't hear them because there are 9 LPO horns in front of you rearranging your internal organs while it happens. Just another day at the office......."
It was the concert.... I certainly did not hear it.
Still in trouble with the chest infection, my ears too silted up to listen to this Jurowski 6th - or (much worse) the Bychkov/BBCSO Leningrad tonight. Bit fed up.
("So, BOO HOO!" - Said of course with the force and sarcasm of Liz Taylor to Richard Burton in Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf?)
Comment
-
-
I strongly disagree with Seckers on his nothing must precede Mahler 6 theory. For myself I need something before the main dish. In any case there seems to be a larger buzz around the orchestral tune up for a second half masterwork.
Good thoughts from him on the movement order though. Let's not recommence that argument!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Alison View PostI strongly disagree with Seckers on his nothing must precede Mahler 6 theory. For myself I need something before the main dish. In any case there seems to be a larger buzz around the orchestral tune up for a second half masterwork.
Good thoughts from him on the movement order though. Let's not recommence that argument!
I'm with johnb on the question of the middle movements order. I'm quite happy to hear it either way and to accept the conductors choice. I think we must accept that the Mahler 6 exists in what is effectively two versions.
Listening to the extraordinary precision and virtuosity of the LPO last night I did just wonder whether Mahler is becoming too easy, lacking the sense of Herculean struggle just to get round the notes that characterises many older renditions and whether this might account for the feeling of some emotional coolness noted by some."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by Alison View PostI strongly disagree with Seckers on his nothing must precede Mahler 6 theory. For myself I need something before the main dish. In any case there seems to be a larger buzz around the orchestral tune up for a second half masterwork.
Good thoughts from him on the movement order though. Let's not recommence that argument!
You distract them with your fire-eating Alison, while I get the wagons in a circle
Comment
-
Maybe, the leningrad ain't all bad
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
Still in trouble with the chest infection, my ears too silted up to listen to this Jurowski 6th - or (much worse) the Bychkov/BBCSO Leningrad tonight. Bit fed up.
("So, BOO HOO!" - Said of course with the force and sarcasm of Liz Taylor to Richard Burton in Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf?)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by edashtav View PostOh dear, I'm sorry to hear that Jayne. I, a rabid unbeliever, listened to Bychkov's Leningrad this evening and thought that he made a convincing case for the work. I was longing to hear whether you, a devout yet insightfulful believer, shared my feelings. I'll keep my fingers crossed and hope that your ears recover before the iPlayer's week is out. Whatever, ...get better, soon for FOR3 NEEDS YOU!
When my own ears were silted up for several weeks a couple of years ago I took to recording any interesting concerts and playing back when things returned to whatever passes for normal."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostI always have liked the two versions. And in some ways, I thought this was a good idea on the night.
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
Comment