Now, there's a test. I don't think it's Stern, but someone like that? [i.e. that sort of age]
Performance on 3 25 Feb 2011 LSO/Harding
Collapse
X
-
Cellini
I'm going to stick my kneck out and say, as its someone with a big vibrato and sugary sound, it could be Zuckermann or Perlman?
It was certainly a lot better than last night, but recorded in quite a boomy and echoey hall. (Or did they just add a lot of reverb?)
Comment
-
Cellini
Originally posted by Pianorak View PostCellini - Your review of the Brahms Violin Concerto, for which many thanks, did prompt me to listen to it on BBCiPlayer today. But for your review I would have blamed the thin sound of the solo violin on microphone placing. I know too little about the violin to comment further. A couple of questions though: Would another soloist playing the very same instrument have been able to produce a richer sound? Is it perhaps just nerves which can be responsible for producing such an unsatisfactory, not to say unpleasant, sound?
I've just seen an interesting DVD and CD of James Ehnes playing on nine different fiddles, all Strads and Guanarius del Gesu's. He sounded the same on all instruments, with just subtle differences hardly detectable to me anyway. On the CD he plays the same passage from the Bruch Scottish Fantasy on each instrument, and there is only a slight difference between two of the del Gesu's played at the end of the section. (one is not quite as good as the other).
Of course this sort of test has limitations because I noticed on the DVD that the mic remained in the same position throughout, as it obviously should, but of course the gain would have been adjusted to keep each instrument recorded at the same level. So this would not show up which violin had the biggest sound and projected the most.
I have suggested that the nine Stads and del G's should be tested against nine of the best modern instruments, say all no more than about 30 years old. However, I've been informed by an Americam luthier that owners of these valuable instruments are nervous about any new tests as they have in the past found that in blind tests people prefered the new instruments! One complained that it was unfair when he had to pay so much to insure them every year!
The man who owns the nine instruments and more as well has about £40 million + invested, plus a lot of valuable bows, and he is the one who bought the "Marsick" Strad I heard James playing on Monday at the Wigmore Hall. He has it on permanent loan, he can't afford to buy it. He's just a poor musician like the rest of us, except he's certainly not a poor player, only poor in wealth terms.
Edit: Oh yes, and of course in the case of Janine Jansens nerves can wreck your sound, and nerves are usually the result of a loss in confidence due to a dodgy technique. But I heard her Wigmore a few months ago and her sound was if anything even worse!!Last edited by Guest; 26-02-11, 22:02.
Comment
-
Cellini - Thanks for your response. Have just looked at Ms Jansen's website and found this interesting snippet:
<<The outstanding instrument being used by Janine Jansen is the violin by Antonio Stradivari, Cremona, 1727, “Barrere” on extended loan from the Elise Mathilde Fund.>>
I wonder if she played it for the Brahms under discussion. Any view on that instrument?
Edited: [Cellini quote] But I heard her Wigmore a few months ago and her sound was if anything even worse!!
Difficult to believe - Poor girl! What can one say!?My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)
Comment
-
-
It was Christian Ferras with the BPO/Karajan.
Cellini,
About the sound produced by different violins and the players or listener's perception: would it be fair to say that the player is greatly more aware of the nuances of different instruments and their responsiveness and the way they 'speak' to his or her playing than a listener would ever realise, and that the difference in responsiveness, the capabilities of the instrument to 'speak' and the range of colours and dynamics, etc in turn influence how the violinist responds to the instrument and the music and that can, in turn, influence his or her interpretation and raise his performance?
I ask because that was definitely my impression in the past when I played various classical guitars from bog standard to fine concert instruments. Mind you I was a pretty lousy classical guitarist.Last edited by johnb; 26-02-11, 22:26.
Comment
-
-
Cellini
Originally posted by Pianorak View PostCellini - Thanks for your response. Have just looked at Ms Jansen's website and found this interesting snippet:
<<The outstanding instrument being used by Janine Jansen is the violin by Antonio Stradivari, Cremona, 1727, “Barrere” on extended loan from the Elise Mathilde Fund.>>
I wonder if she played it for the Brahms under discussion. Any view on that instrument?
Someone else might well sound completely different on that same instrument.
Comment
-
Cellini
Originally posted by johnb View PostIt was Christian Ferras with the BPO/Karajan.
Cellini,
About the sound produced by different violins and the players or listener's perception: would it be fair to say that the player is greatly more aware of the nuances of different instruments and their responsiveness and the way they 'speak' to his or her playing than a listener would ever realise, and that the difference in responsiveness, the capabilities of the instrument to 'speak' and the range of colours and dynamics, etc in turn influence how the violinist responds to the instrument and the music and that can, in turn, influence his or her interpretation and raise his performance?
I ask because that was definitely my impression in the past when I played various classical guitars from bog standard to fine concert instruments. Mind you I was a pretty lousy classical guitarist.
As for instruments, yes - it can influence a player to play in a certain way - but it would still be fairly subtle. It's true that on a good instrument one would be able to raise the performance level.
What players of all stringed instruments look for is a big sound and the ability of the instrument to carry well, in other words, projection. Players sound more or less the same on any reasonably good instrument, but some instruments will carry much better, and this will in turn make it less hard work for the player. So its easier to project a pianissimo, and at fff you don't have to use so much pressure and play quite so near to the bridge, but in any case we all do play nearer the bridge even if the instrument has a huge sound!
Comment
-
amateur51
Ah Christian Ferras was a wonderful artist. It is always sad when someone can no longer carry on with life, such that they decide to take matters into their own hands.
Fortunately he has left some fine recordings and there are some 'live' performances available on youtube too:
He and Pierre Barbizet recorded a fine set of Beethoven violin sonatas in 1958 that are still available and sounding good.
Here are Ferras & Barbizet in the first movement of Franck's violin sonata - the rest is available on youtube:
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
And here he is with a very young Zubin Mehta in a wonderfully virile and sensuous account of Sibelius violin concerto:
Comment
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View Post. . .Here are Ferras & Barbizet in the first movement of Franck's violin sonata - the rest is available on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnQEr-ctfZ8&feature=fvst . . .
Just been listening to the op.12/1 - no reservations about the playing whatsoever. Can only assume I wasn't in a receptive mood when listening the first time round (happens, you know ).Last edited by Pianorak; 27-02-11, 11:11.My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)
Comment
-
-
Daring Tripod
So very many thanks Cellini for starting this thread and all your erudite postings. I am learning a lot from the discussion and thoroughly enjoy all the comments. That's what the 'Radio 3 Forum' should be about. Thanks again to all of you
Comment
-
Cellini
Originally posted by Daring Tripod View PostSo very many thanks Cellini for starting this thread and all your erudite postings. I am learning a lot from the discussion and thoroughly enjoy all the comments. That's what the 'Radio 3 Forum' should be about. Thanks again to all of you
I've just found out a bit more about Janine Jansen. She has apparently had to take 5 months off due to overwork. Maybe she is still having problems? It sounds like she may have only just started concertising again.
I also saw a couple of videos of her being interviewed in Paris, and one of her playing some French music. Pity the director tried to make it into a feature film! But I could see in the brief moments when I could see her properly that maybe there is a problem with her left hand, but there was so much back lighting and fast cutting it was dificult to be certain. And I'm almost sure it was the Strad she was playing on. Trouble is she's so dead georgeous, that I have a problem concentating on her technique and her playing. I think she is basically pretty musical, but just has the other problems.
If she just wants wine and succour and a friendly hand to calm her then I wouldn't say no, especially if I could try out that Strad, amongst other things. Better say no more ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cellini View Post. . . If she just wants wine and succour and a friendly hand to calm her then I wouldn't say no, especially if I could try out that Strad, amongst other things. Better say no more ...My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)
Comment
-
-
Cellini
Originally posted by Pianorak View PostI think you might be too late. I felt there was definitely some "chemistry" between her and Richard Dubugnon, the French composer who interviewed her.
Comment
Comment