Tempting indeed, Pianorak - thanks for the link, it makes for interesting reading.
Square or Forte?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Pianorak View PostMine arrived this morning together with the Clementi Sonatas. The Field Nocturnes arrived yesterday. Square Piano Day!
As mentioned before I thought the Clementi well suited to the Schubert D946/969 and 780. But listening to the D899 and D935 I couldn't help wondering if Schubert, when composing the C minor Impromptu with it's dotted minim ff opening cord (with fermata), was infact thinking/dreaming of a modern Steinway grand. Similarly, in the F minor Impromptu, I felt that the cross-over hands passages with their hushed and extreme legato might make a more profound impact played on a modern grand. Just my immediate impressions - and probably all nonsense. However, it was a new and thoroughly enjoyable experience.My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)
Comment
-
-
Other than the Six Sonatinas, which were written to encourage use of his square piano, very little of Clementi's piano music is played today, but I've been investigating his sonatas since my brief attachment to his square piano. (Except that I'll be using a modern instrument - Calm down, you HIPPos )
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MickyD View PostSuch a shame Athene disappeared and Peter never got to do all the Mendelssohn pieces. I'll keep my eyes peeled for more square piano releases, but I doubt if there will be many.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Peter Katin View Postmy websiteMy life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pianorak View PostThanks for pointing out your website. Just had a look and then hotfooted it to amazon where I came across what looks like a compilation of Dohnanyi/Liszt/Rachmaninov/Lutoslawski with Schiff/Katin/Jablonski. Do you happen to know which version of the Lutoslawski/Paganini Variations that is and who is playing? Also, which piece/s are you playing?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Peter Katin View PostI'm completely foxed by this! There could of course be a mixture of various artists on one CD - this is something over which I, for instance, would have no control, because once a recording company has the rights, they can mix them up as they wish. So I can only say that I might have recorded some Liszt and Rachmaninov but no Dohnanyi or Lutoslawski, and my name is neither Schiff nor Jablonski! I don't know how one can keep track of this procedure - the list on my website is accurate so far as I know, but for instance, there's a Tchaikovsky concerto on that list although I've had two emails saying that it isn't available. I intended to include a reissue of the Rachmaninov Preludes but the anticipated date has been put back to "some time after the new year" which might mean next Christmas... Of course, I can do nothing about it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Peter Katin View PostI'm completely foxed by this! There could of course be a mixture of various artists on one CD - this is something over which I, for instance, would have no control, because once a recording company has the rights, they can mix them up as they wish.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Chris Newman View PostPeter, I have mentioned this on the NYO thread. This record of various artists is available on the Australian Eloquence label together with your wonderful Jean Martinon/LPO Liszt Totentanz. These Aussie records are much cheaper than the British Eloquence from Decca.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by verismissimo View PostPeter Katin's Schubert Impromptus on his 1832 Clementi lobbed in yesterday. Such joy. My first CD with square piano!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostI have a question re. that CD which Peter is the most likely to be able to answer. In the artwork and programme notes for that CD, the instrment used is variously dated as 1832 and 1823. Which is correct? My quess would be 1832, but whoever was responible for proofing the booklet let at least three 1823s through. ;)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Peter Katin View PostAs far as I know, it was 1832 - this is on the artwork of both the Athene and Diversions. I'm referring to the Impromptus; I don't have the other CDs. One can proof-read until blue in the face but there will still be an error somewhere!
Comment
-
-
I was only thinking of the "23" aspect as a possible source of confusion, Peter. I am no particular fan of Robert Anton Wilson myself, but used to share accommodation with someone who was rather more than merely a fan. He droned on about The Law of Fives, and the supposed mystical properties of the number 23 ad nauseam.
Comment
-
Comment