Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte
View Post
Going back to Ravel ...
Collapse
X
-
Osborn
-
Panjandrum
-
amateur51
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostThis reminds me of a few weeks ago at work when I had separate e-mails from two different people with exactly the same name and sent at precisely rhe same time.
Anyway, going back to Ravel...my absolute favourite piece is the complete Daphnis et Chloe. Have many recordings but wouldn't want to be without Boston SO/Munch, LSO/Monteux or BPO/Boulez. Next year (June 8) sees the centenary of the first performance.
As for Bolero and La Valse I love them! What's the problem?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Caliban View Post
S_A please tell us you didn't write your second para completely independently of barber??? You went back and copied it over, right?
Otherwise: too weird
Comment
-
-
barber olly
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostThis reminds me of a few weeks ago at work when I had separate e-mails from two different people with exactly the same name and sent at precisely rhe same time.
Anyway, going back to Ravel...my absolute favourite piece is the complete Daphnis et Chloe. Have many recordings but wouldn't want to be without Boston SO/Munch, LSO/Monteux or BPO/Boulez. Next year (June 8) sees the centenary of the first performance.
As for Bolero and La Valse I love them! What's the problem?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostThen again having heard the wild and wonderful Boston SO/Munch recordings of Bolero and La Valse tonight - I was pleased to hear both works again - a fast and then faster Bolero and a frenzied La Valse indeed.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostWhere in the score is there even a hint of-accelerando? Ravel's own recording actually gradually drops in tempo.
I see from Gramophone that Lionel Salter hated them in 1959 and Jonathan Swain loved them in 1994.Last edited by Barbirollians; 24-01-19, 00:16.
Comment
-
Comment