Pardon me for resurrecting this thread but I've been immersing myself in this work recently, and listening to numerous recordings of it (in fact I listened to nothing else for several days), so I was digging around to see what people here had to say. And the last post until this one is in praise of the 1975 Kubelik recording, which is a nice coincidence since I heard this for the first time last week and found it very beautiful, apart from a fluff or two in the orchestra which is no shame in a live recording. Actually I find that discussions of Mahler recordings often omit mention of Kubelik for no reason I can fathom. I prefer listening to his (and the Bavarian Radio orchestra's) Mahler than that of many more famous conductors with more famous ensembles.
Now I hesitate even to talk about comparing recordings/performances of this work because I feel like I have such a deep and intimate long-term relationship with it, and talking about this or that ephemeral detail seems to me somehow tasteless or even indecent. But at the same time I don't think one should necessarily be governed by taste and decency, so... I wouldn't want to say I have a favourite recording of it, because almost all the ones I've heard are sung, played and conducted with such commitment and concentration; but the one I listen to most often, which isn't the same thing, is the one conducted by Klaus Tennstedt with Klaus König and Agnes Baltsa, and I think one reason is that it has a much more realistic recorded balance between voice and orchestra than most others, especially in the first movement. Some might say that Mahler over-orchestrated it, but I wonder how they could think this was a miscalculation on his part, given how delicate the vocal accompaniments are in the rest of the piece (and indeed given how sensitive he is to such balances throughout his work)... nevertheless most recording engineers seem to think that they need to give the soloist a helping hand in this movement, and I absolutely disagree. Haven't they read the sung text, for ¶€§º# sake? Anyway the EMI people working with Tennstedt seem to have grasped it better than most.
Also I wonder why people take seriously Mahler's little aside about people shooting themselves after hearing it. How is a composer supposed to speak about a piece of music as incandescently expressive and almost unbearably truthful as that one? I can completely understand him making light of it in that sort of way. Hearing from "Die liebe Erde" to the end (with everything that comes before this, obviously!) is every single time one of the most heartwarming moments in all of music as far as I'm concerned. Please excuse my effusiveness..
Now I hesitate even to talk about comparing recordings/performances of this work because I feel like I have such a deep and intimate long-term relationship with it, and talking about this or that ephemeral detail seems to me somehow tasteless or even indecent. But at the same time I don't think one should necessarily be governed by taste and decency, so... I wouldn't want to say I have a favourite recording of it, because almost all the ones I've heard are sung, played and conducted with such commitment and concentration; but the one I listen to most often, which isn't the same thing, is the one conducted by Klaus Tennstedt with Klaus König and Agnes Baltsa, and I think one reason is that it has a much more realistic recorded balance between voice and orchestra than most others, especially in the first movement. Some might say that Mahler over-orchestrated it, but I wonder how they could think this was a miscalculation on his part, given how delicate the vocal accompaniments are in the rest of the piece (and indeed given how sensitive he is to such balances throughout his work)... nevertheless most recording engineers seem to think that they need to give the soloist a helping hand in this movement, and I absolutely disagree. Haven't they read the sung text, for ¶€§º# sake? Anyway the EMI people working with Tennstedt seem to have grasped it better than most.
Also I wonder why people take seriously Mahler's little aside about people shooting themselves after hearing it. How is a composer supposed to speak about a piece of music as incandescently expressive and almost unbearably truthful as that one? I can completely understand him making light of it in that sort of way. Hearing from "Die liebe Erde" to the end (with everything that comes before this, obviously!) is every single time one of the most heartwarming moments in all of music as far as I'm concerned. Please excuse my effusiveness..
Comment