Malcolm Arnold Festival

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
    Gone fishin'
    • Sep 2011
    • 30163

    #16
    , Suffy.

    I'd only add "intellectual" to your "powerful and emotional experience".
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

    Comment

    • Andrew Slater
      Full Member
      • Mar 2007
      • 1807

      #17
      Originally posted by EdgeleyRob View Post
      Agreed , I wouldn't be without any of these works.His time must surely come.
      According to Andrew Penny in an interview during the festival, Arnold's time is NOW - '...these are the 'Good Old Days.' ' (He cited current programming of Arnold's shorter pieces, particularly on CFM). By the way I noticed that on R3 we got a movement from the second symphony on In Tune on Thursday 20th (with an interview with the Artistic Director of the festival, Paul Harris) and the scherzo of the fifth on Sunday morning at about 9-30. I suppose single movements are all we can hope for at the moment.....

      Comment

      • Petrushka
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 12391

        #18
        Originally posted by Andrew Slater View Post
        According to Andrew Penny in an interview during the festival, Arnold's time is NOW - '...these are the 'Good Old Days.' ' (He cited current programming of Arnold's shorter pieces, particularly on CFM). By the way I noticed that on R3 we got a movement from the second symphony on In Tune on Thursday 20th (with an interview with the Artistic Director of the festival, Paul Harris) and the scherzo of the fifth on Sunday morning at about 9-30. I suppose single movements are all we can hope for at the moment.....
        Arnold's symphonies need to be performed and broadcast on a reasonably regular basis before one can say that his time has truly come. What they need is a champion of the calibre of a Handley or a Hickox and consistent programming by our professional orchestras. Has Sir Mark Elder, for example, taken a look at them? Right up his street I would have thought. Once there is some sort of momentum going then his time will have come. I believe it will.
        "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

        Comment

        • EdgeleyRob
          Guest
          • Nov 2010
          • 12180

          #19
          Originally posted by Andrew Slater View Post
          I suppose single movements are all we can hope for at the moment.....
          True but what a disgrace

          Comment

          • Nick Armstrong
            Host
            • Nov 2010
            • 26604

            #20
            Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
            They are "difficult", Bbm, but not in the usual sense that Music is often so described. "Difficult" because they sound "accessible": good tunes, rich harmony, exciting rhythms etc. But, for me, there was always a sense of "otherness" about them, too. The glorious Fifth Symphony, for example, with its "schmaltzy" Slow Movement; the Finale just seems to peeter out anti-climactically after the "victorious" return of the second movement theme. The Scherzo seems at first hearings merely boisterous although with some "ill-judged" heavy-handedness. And the First Movement also seemed an almost rhapsodic run through the motions of "Sonata Form", with its almost simple-minded "Second Subject". For years, I dismissed it as a pleasant-enough, but not quite satisfactorily coherent attempt at a Symphony by a decent tune-smith and film composer.

            But, it "stuck", niggling on the retina of my memory, and when I heard the devastating Seventh Symphony, it occured to me that my patronizing attitude to the Fifth needed a brisk scrubbing over. I think that the "secret" of these works is in those "shadows": the passing moments of disquiet and disruption that first struck me as incompetence. Obviously the melody of the Second Movement is "scmaltzy": exaggeratedly so. It is like someone exaggerating their sorrow, making a public joke of it, in order to cover very deep feelings of loss or even betrayal. Heard in this way, the anticlimax of the Finale makes perfect, powerful sense, as do the beligerent moments of the Scherzo and the "twee" biits of the First Movement. The "accessibility" is a "front" to disguise very disturbing passions and psychological states - and, with repeated hearings, I think to reveal them, too.

            Here endeth today's lesson: Best Wishes!

            I've been waiting until the weekend to reply to your insightful post, ferne ! Like you I was drawn to No 5 whilst finding some of it trite or incongruous. It was the 'cool' scherzo that I loved mainly, that dapper percussion-over-a-bed-of-strings music with brassy interruptions... sort of like Ealing comedy mixed with Shostakovich...

            But I had an epiphany with the last movement of No 5 on a flight home from Geneva one winter's evening - I was listening to the scherzo as we flew over London came into land at Heathrow but suddenly the pilot aborted the landing and with a surge we climbed and turned - anxiety reigned in the cabin, as we didn't know if there was a fault or what was happening. It was a perfectly clear night but very windy, and we started to circle over central London. By this time I was listening to the last movement of No 5 and the contrast between the glorious, perfect low-level view of illuminated central London and the sense of anxiety seemed mirrored in the contrasts in the music. In particular, I remember that the schmaltzy aspects of the music seemed to carry potent echoes of Piccadilly, Leicester Square, etc etc which I could distinguish perfectly, echoes of slightly tawdry but wonderful London folklore, music halls, coffee bars, VE day, variety theatre etc etc... especially in that 'victorious' theme in the last movement you mention, which also conveyed one's strong wish to be down there, back among it, home and safe... I played the last movement three of four times as we circled, and I remember that when we eventually landed, it coincided with the start of that 'victorious' theme again (exactly 4'00" in the Hickox/LSO recording which is the one on my iPod). I confess to having shed a manly tear or three.

            Ever since, Arnold 5 has been a 'talisman' piece for me, the tawdry and the exhilarating and the fun and the anxious are indeed 'cheek-by-jowl' as S_A says, but then... that's life !!
            "...the isle is full of noises,
            Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
            Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
            Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

            Comment

            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
              Gone fishin'
              • Sep 2011
              • 30163

              #21
              Many Thanks, SuperCali!
              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

              Comment

              • Nick Armstrong
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 26604

                #22
                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                Many Thanks, SuperCali!
                You are more than welcome, fernegeliebte
                "...the isle is full of noises,
                Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                Comment

                • IRF

                  #23
                  Hello :) Some of you may remember me from the old R3 forums... I don't believe I've been here before though (actually I very rarely find time to read forums these days).

                  I was at the festival and wrote a short (*ahem*) review of it. I haven't put it up on my web site yet b ut for anybody that may be interested, here it is:




                  The Sixth Malcolm Arnold Festival

                  Derngate Auditorium

                  Northampton

                  21-23 October 2011

                  I’ve just crossed out eight pages written in my hotel room over the weekend because it was all rubbish and didn’t really describe the event at all. So this is version two.

                  Friday 21 October 2011 would have been Malcolm Arnold’s 90th birthday, and festival organiser Paul Harris came up with the frankly bonkers idea of celebrating it by putting on all nine of Arnold’s symphonies over a single weekend. Nine symphonies (plus some other stuff) by eight different orchestras and six different conductors all for the princely sum of £12. It sounds logistically insane on paper. In practice, it ran flawlessly and produced a unique musical experience for a few die-hard fans. “Few” being the operative word. Where was everybody?

                  Where were all the people who complain that British composers are under-represented in our concert halls? I’ve just spent a weekend listening to the music of Malcolm Arnold, Eric Coates, Ralph Vaughan Williams, Benjamin Britten, William Walton, John Ireland, Gilbert Vinter, Paul Harris, and Gordon Jacob. (Plus a couple of foreign chaps.) All for £12. Why wasn’t the event sold out?

                  The audience looked lost in Northampton’s cavernous Derngate auditorium on Friday night. No more than a third of the seats were full, I estimated (the figure I heard later was 400 people; seems about right, as the hall’s nominal capacity is 1500), and the numbers for the daytime concerts on Saturday and Sunday seemed even lower. The only time the audience was anywhere near capacity was for Sunday night’s “gala” concert. (Tickets for that cost twice as much as the rest of the weekend combined, but of course it had a pretty young soloist who’s been on TV and had that nice piece by Tchaikovsky that everybody can hum. I despair.)

                  Enough despairing. Let’s celebrate the music that the intrepid 400 experienced throughout the weekend.

                  Friday night:

                  Cambridgeshire Symphony Orchestra conducted by Steve Bingham, soloist Claudia Moore-Gillon.

                  Arnold: Symphony No. 1
                  Coates: Dambusters March
                  Vaughan Williams: The Lark Ascending
                  Arnold: Symphony No. 2

                  Obviously you’re not going to get eight big-name orchestras for a £12 weekend ticket, something that led me to face these concerts with a bit of trepidation, as I don’t have any experience with what “amateur” orchestras are actually like so didn’t really know what to expect. The Cambridgeshire Symphony Orchestra is a very young orchestra, but they are superbly professional and I couldn’t find a thing wrong with their performances of these symphonies (which I know pretty well). And in fact that was true of the whole weekend: every one of the youth or amateur orchestras performed superbly and I never once felt that I was getting anything “second rate”. It’s taught me a pleasant lesson about the huge amount of talent that exists outside the big name bands. The soloist was so young she couldn’t have been out of school yet, but played beautifully.

                  The famous Coates and Vaughan Williams pieces seemed a bit obviously there to get bums on seats, but they did fit well within the programme. Putting the Dambusters March immediately following the fiercely anti-war Arnold’s 1st symphony (the last movement is pure parody of a military march) completely changes the way you think about the piece.

                  Saturday morning:

                  Saturday’s programme started early with an entertaining talk buy John Amis (running over his allotted time as the audience begged him to carry on) and then a brief chamber concert:

                  Arnold: Oboe Sonatina
                  Arnold: Flute Sonatina
                  Arnold: Clarinet Sonatina

                  All chamber concerts throughout the festival was provided by various combinations of six musicians from the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland.

                  The main concert of the morning was by the Slaithwaite Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Benjamin Ellin, soloist Philip Robertson:

                  Haydn: Trumpet Concerto in E flat
                  Arnold: Symphony No. 3

                  The Haydn... did exactly what Haydn does. I don’t dislike it but find it hard to get excited by it. The Third Symphony is much more meaty and was superbly played.

                  After lunch, the University of London Symphony Orchestra conducted by Daniel Capps tackled:

                  Britten: Four Sea Interludes from Peter Grimes
                  Arnold: Symphony No. 4

                  This was a highlight of the festival, and not just because the symphony is one of my personal favourites, but because the orchestra’s performance was out of this world. It got a hugely appreciative reception from the whole audience and was pretty unanimously declared the highlight (so far).

                  I almost felt sorry for the Northamptonshire County Youth Orchestra, conducted by Peter Dunkley, having to follow it:

                  Walton: Coronation March – Crown Imperial
                  Arnold: Symphony No. 5

                  I can’t fault their performance, and conventional wisdom has it that Arnold’s 5th is his best, but it was an uphill struggle for the young orchestra to meet the show-stealing standard set by the 4th.

                  The second chamber concert of the day was for some odd reason held in the Derngate’s foyer, a space which is specifically designed to be unsuitable for such an activity. Oh well, the music was fine even if the location was stupid:

                  Arnold: Fantasy for Bassoon
                  Arnold: Fantasy for Clarinet
                  Arnold: Fantasy for Horn
                  Arnold: Fantasy for Flute
                  Arnold: Fantasy for Oboe

                  The next chamber concert was back in the more appropriate (though a bit hot and airless) recital room:

                  Arnold: Fantasy for Flute and Clarinet
                  Arnold: Three Pieces for Piano
                  Ireland: Fantasy Sonata for Clarinet and Piano

                  The Ealing Symphony Orchestra, conducted by John Gibbons, approached the Saturday evening programme in exactly the right spirit to make it one of the most entertaining (if not musically perfect) concerts I have ever been to:

                  Saint-Saëns: The Carnival of the Animals
                  Arnold: Carnival of Animals
                  Arnold: Grand Concerto Gastronomique for Eater, Waiter, Food, and Orchestra
                  Arnold: Symphony No. 6

                  The movements of Carnival of the Animals were introduced by Ogden Nash’s poems, which I’ve never actually heard before but are quite amusing. Arnold’s additional animals had new poems specially commissioned for the festival from a local school. The children’s poems were perhaps not quite as polished as Nash’s, but they were still clever and suitably funny.

                  Arnold’s Concerto for Eater, Waiter, Food, and Orchestra is... exactly what it says it is. The “Eater “ (a very large gentleman) has to consume a six-course meal in time with the six movements. It’s all played up very farcically, and very silly, especially when the orchestra join in (the conductor is served coffee, while the leader pours wine and passes it round the violins, all without missing a beat). Eater and Waitress (and conductor) ham it up tremendously, and though it sounds stupid when you read about it you can’t help laughing at it when you’re there.

                  But the interesting revelation is that behind all the shenanigans is a beautiful piece of music, a fine example of the big tuneful pieces that Arnold is well known for.

                  And, you know, the festival needed something light-hearted at this stage. Arnold is probably best known as a writer of fairly light music with big tunes, but I find his symphonies altogether more dark and disturbing than his reputation would suggest. His slow movements especially always sound bleak and tortured.

                  So at this half-way point I’m feeling emotionally battered, and the light-hearted evening programme has been a welcome relief. The evening ends with the sixth symphony, perhaps my favourite, and despite the gallows march in the slow movement it ends on a big, triumphant fanfare.

                  Six down, three to go.

                  Comment

                  • IRF

                    #24
                    Whoops, I'm obviously far too verbose it wouldn't let me post it all.

                    Here is part 2, for anyone that has the stamina left.




                    Sunday Morning:

                    Arnold: Symphony No. 7
                    Shostakovich: Festival Overture
                    Arnold: Symphony No. 8

                    Andrew Penny conducts the Hull Philharmonic Orchestra in the 7th and the East Riding Youth Orchestra in the 8th. Nestled between these two is the short Festival Overture–played by the combined forces of both orchestras! It’s a very impressive sound.

                    Especially impressive is how well the young people of the East Riding orchestra handle the bleak 8th symphony. It seems like a very difficult piece to tackle. Or maybe I’m wring, maybe it’s actually easier to play than it is to listen to (Penny says in his afternoon talk, “we could hear you concentrating”!)

                    The musical content of the afternoon programme is light. Andrew Penny gives a very interesting talk on conducting his Naxos cycle of Arnold’s symphonies. Local radio presenter John Griff gave a talk on the historical events of the year of each symphony’s composition–the subject was well presented but a bit unnecessary I thought. The only afternoon music was the final chamber concert of the festival:

                    Arnold: Wind Quintet
                    Vinter: Hunter’s Moon for Horn and Piano
                    Harris: Sonatina for Piano
                    Jacob: Partita for Bassoon
                    Arnold: three Shanties for Wind Quintet

                    Finally, after a break for dinner, the “gala” concert:

                    The Malcolm Arnold Festival Orchestra conducted by John Gibbons, soloists Nicola Benedetti and Leonard Elschenbroich

                    Arnold: Symphony No. 9
                    Brahms: Concerto for Violin and Cello
                    Tchaikovsky: Fantasy Overture Romeo and Juliet

                    No, I didn’t write that backwards. The programme was deliberately inverted, apparently following a comment by Malcolm Arnold that he thought concerts would be more interesting that way!

                    I am not convinced.

                    It somehow seems that if you’re doing a festival devoted to all nine symphonies, you really need to end proceedings with the 9th, not with a bit of Tchaikovsky.

                    Whatever.

                    So. The 9th. A lot of people say it’s a poor work and shouldn’t have been written, that it shows a man whose talent has completely disintegrated. At least two distinguished speakers this weekend have specifically said that the festival should have stopped at the 8th.

                    And yet...

                    I have never been left so emotionally devastated by a piece of music. At the end, I couldn’t even clap. I was just... numb. I had to go and walk round outside during the interval because people were trying to talk to me and... I couldn’t talk.

                    I expect music to affect me emotionally. If a concert doesn’t make me cry, I think something’s wrong. But I’ve never felt like this before. In isolation, I don’t know if it would have had the same impact. But as the culmination of the intense weekend, following the journey through Arnold’s life in his symphonies, to be hit with this... this... was just indescribable. I don’t think any other experience could match this.

                    And yes you can see its flaws and yes you can see that it lacks the skill and flair of his earlier work. But I don’t believe this was written by a broken man who was no longer mentally capable of composing. I think this was written by a man who knew exactly what he wanted to say and exactly how he wanted to say it.

                    And at the end, the only important thing is, did it affect me?

                    Yes it did.

                    And then there was some Brahms and Tchaikovsky and that was the end.

                    (Actually, I’m being unfair. The Brahms is a tremendous piece of music (one I haven’t heard before) and both soloists were superb in it. The Tchaikovsky is a nice one to hum along to... to be honest it was good to have these pieces at the end of the concert, as it definitely released the tension that the 9th otherwise leaves you with.)

                    Comment

                    • Serial_Apologist
                      Full Member
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 38007

                      #25
                      Many, many thanks for posting these reviews for us, IRF - most kind!

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30657

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                        Many, many thanks for posting these reviews for us, IRF - most kind!
                        And also hello IRF! Sorry about the limit on words. Didn't know there was one - don't think anyone else has had a problem heretofore .

                        And btw I'm sure Andrew will appreciate your comments on the 9th.
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • Nick Armstrong
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 26604

                          #27
                          One gets a great flavour of the event from these posts, thanks

                          I think I would have gone home or to the pub after No 9, if it had affected me as it did you. Not a piece I know. You make me want to look into it.

                          "...the isle is full of noises,
                          Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                          Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                          Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                          Comment

                          • Richard Tarleton

                            #28
                            Hi IRF, any sign of the Guitar Concerto amongst that lot? The only Arnold work on my shelves I'm afraid but I did see Bream play it circa 1972 with Arnold conducting the ECO in the QEH. A lovely work. I have the EMI recording that Bream made towards the end of his career.

                            Comment

                            • IRF

                              #29
                              Hi Richard, no guitar concerto but they did the complete guitar music (including the concerto) at the 3rd festival in 2008, Milos Karadaglic playing guitar. Julian Bream was guest of honour at the enent, and after an introductory speech... hold on let me dig out my review of that one:



                              Well, Julian Bream was along as guest of honour, which was a nice touch. He started proceedings with a very amusing speech. Then, after his speech, he sat down in the soloist's chair and picked up a guitar. Hello, I thought, the poor chap's got a bit confused...

                              No... he really was playing the first item, Serenade for Guitar and Strings, having requested that he may be allowed to play it one more time!

                              I've seen Julian Bream playing live. Playing Malcolm Arnold. Julian Bream!

                              It was quite amazing. I actually had a lump in my throat.

                              Something I thought I would never see.

                              Worth the trip just for that!
                              All for £12

                              Comment

                              • Richard Tarleton

                                #30
                                Wonderful! Thank you for that! A very moving occasion it must have been.
                                R

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X