Originally posted by Ian Thumwood
View Post
Mozart Fest
Collapse
X
-
Roehre
-
Roehre
Didn't realise that Uri Caine had recorded "Diabelli Variations." I have his first Mahler CD "Primal light" and was intrigued by the Goldberg Variations disc as I like Bach's work too. The Mahler disc is very good. However, I think most jazz musicians have borrowed little from the kind of approach to harmony and rhythm that Beehoven employed. Uri Caine is probably an exception even if he does tend to use the material as the basis of his "re-composition" in contract to actually employing the harmony used the these composers. I think he has worked on Mozart's music too and having met him once, know that he is extremely well-informed about all kinds if music. He is a really interesting person to converse with and a top bloke too. Easily one of the nicest jazz musicians I have met. Needless to say, he is a great pianist as well.
For me, the problem with Mozart is that he was a visionary in some respects but a bit regressive in others. To 21st Century ears, you can hear harmonies in composers like D. Scarlatti which sound "modern" whereas the era of Mozart didn't move harmony on much from what was happening in the mid-18th century. From a jazz prespective, I think harmony is a major component of music insofar that it is an essential ingredient of what makes jazz improvisation interesting. The better jazz musicians have a more sophisticated harmonic palette than musicians of Mozart's era as you would expect from 150-200 years of development. Harmony in Classical music definately got "sexier" to my ears with the arrival of Chopin. It is the impact of colour in classical music that really appeals to me hence my preference for the French Impressionist or Messaien. Mozart just doesn't tick all the boxes for me - have to say that I find a lot of his music extremely irritating. I have as much enthusiasm for WAM's music as Rap or Folk Music.
Comment
-
-
I've always put Mozart very high up my list of favourites. But I do take the point that some of his music would never be played, had it been written by a lesser composer. Wall to wall playing of his music does not do him any favours. There are composers who wrote much less, for whom blanket coverage might be more beneficial.
Comment
-
-
Alf-Prufrock
Originally posted by Roehre View PostRobbins Landon stated simply that nothing composed before the Sinfonia concertante KV364 is better than the best works of M's colleagues at that time.
Comment
-
Norfolk Born
On the first day of New Year, my DJ played for me.....On the second day ....
In common with some other contributors to this thread, I love the music of Mozart, but not to the exclusion of anybody else's for 12 days.
Comment
-
Originally posted by verismissimo View PostRoehre, if we followed Robbins Landon's suggestion that good Mozart starts with K364, we'd have to forego, par exemple, K201, K218, K271, K296, K297, K304, K 309-11, K317, K319 and K338.
Need I say more? :)It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ian Thumwood View PostI suppose that I am probably one of the few listeners who detests Mozart's music.
Comment
-
-
Roehre
Originally posted by verismissimo View PostRoehre, if we followed Robbins Landon's suggestion that good Mozart starts with K364, we'd have to forego, par exemple, K201, K218, K271, K296, K297, K304, K 309-11, K317, K319 and K338.
Need I say more? :)
The Philips "The best of" excerpts from the CME ( 25CDs) includes most of the works you mention. It omits the sonatas 309 and 311 e.g., but that one includes e.g. KV299 as well. and that's more a popular than a top notch Mozart, isn't it?
But it 's RL's reasoning and choice, with which I for the best part concur, but certainly not completely.Last edited by Guest; 03-12-10, 22:25.
Comment
-
Idamante
There's a piece about the Mozart marathon by Tom Service in the Grauniad but for some reason the comments are disabled.
Tom Service: Radio 3's decision to play every last Köchel number over 12 days in the New Year will thrill many Mozart fans. But is it an immersion too far?
Personally, I find this kind of programmiing lazy and deeply unintelligent, a kind of musical equivalent of autism. As music lovers we should be trying to expand our range of experiences while deepening our knowledge of what we already know. In the case of Mozart that means getting to hear the music of his contemporaries like JC & CPE Bach so we can judge for ourselves who's better.
I should add that some of my all time favourite pieces are by Mozart although nowadays I tend to find Haydn's music more interesting and enjoyable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roehre View PostThis is a straightforward example how to cut costs.
At least I know that I don't have to check R3 for programs to listen to .:cool2:
I like Mozart, and I quite liked some of the other total immersion efforts, but 12 days is rather long. Can't we have time off for good behaviour?
Comment
-
Comment