Listening to Paul Lewis play D899 tonight it suddenly struck me how it's permissible to play an odd Impromptu on its own, perhaps as an encore, but you never (OK, I never ) hear anyone play a really mixed collection drawing on both sets, as you might with Debussy Preludes or Images, Chopin Studies, Preludes or Waltzes, etc etc.
It's as if there's a feeling that each of Schubert's sets of 4 is somehow considered to be One Big Work, even though it has always (I think) been permissible to play one out of context (much as R3 now plays detached movements of any multi-movement work).
Personally I'm very happy to hear the Schuberts as a set but would have no qualms at all about a pianist playing them in a different order or making a random selection from both books. Yet nobody seems to do that. Would it somehow be a sin against the holy ghost?
Any views??
It's as if there's a feeling that each of Schubert's sets of 4 is somehow considered to be One Big Work, even though it has always (I think) been permissible to play one out of context (much as R3 now plays detached movements of any multi-movement work).
Personally I'm very happy to hear the Schuberts as a set but would have no qualms at all about a pianist playing them in a different order or making a random selection from both books. Yet nobody seems to do that. Would it somehow be a sin against the holy ghost?
Any views??
Comment