If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The Art of Fugue Live from Wigmore Hall: Monday 18th September
PS - on closer examination it was only selected highlights.
So was it recorded rather than real 'live'? I find the various interpretations of 'live' difficult to sort out these days - to me it means 'broadcast as it's happening'.
So was it recorded rather than real 'live'? I find the various interpretations of 'live' difficult to sort out these days - to me it means 'broadcast as it's happening'.
The concert did start at 1.00pm today. So the broadcast must have been live transmission.
I suppose we c/should have guessed that this would be a shortened version in order to fit in a one-hour concert. I wouldn’t say what was played was highlights but the opening announce c/should have included the information that what we were going to hear was not a complete work due to the time constrain or some such.
I heard bits of the programme. I don't find that to be unsatisfactory. I often listen to bits of Bach and I find The Art of Fugue eminently suitable for dabbling.
'All' is equally agreeable, and I sometimes achieve it - especially relishing the approach to the last note.
'Nothing at all' is the only option I would not take.
How can one have "all" of this unfinished work without having a go at completing Contrapunctus XIV (whether as the three part fugue following CPE Bach's title, of a four part fugue as suggested in Bach's obituary)?
I heard bits of the programme. I don't find that to be unsatisfactory. I often listen to bits of Bach and I find The Art of Fugue eminently suitable for dabbling.
'All' is equally agreeable, and I sometimes achieve it - especially relishing the approach to the last note.
'Nothing at all' is the only option I would not take.
I think it was really the talking between movements which put me off. The fact that different interpretations play around with the running order I suppose supports dabbling - my musical education not up to discussing possible running orders - Podger/Brecon Baroque and Esfahani/AAM both mix it up - but they all help to get to grips with this marvellous work. Neither am I qualified to discuss ending strategies - only that all 4 of the recorded versions I've amassed have incomplete XlVs whether or not they follow it with another piece (e.g. Hewitt with BWV668a, after a long pause).
How can one have "all" of this unfinished work without having a go at completing Contrapunctus XIV (whether as the three part fugue following CPE Bach's title, of a four part fugue as suggested in Bach's obituary)?
I don't think I'm au fait with that three part fugue, but I think the unfinished sudden end, as it stands, is as good an ending as I would like. There's drama in it like a real unanswered question.
In the event of a completion, the experience of listening to Contrapunctus XIV will be a new experience - at least, for me.
... if it is unfinished, then that is 'all' you get.
PS - on closer examination it was only selected highlights.
Ah I misunderstood this bit. I thought you meant it was a programme of selected highlights of the recital, hence my comment about what is 'live' in Beeb terms.
Comment