R3 in Concert one-stop shop

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LMcD
    Full Member
    • Sep 2017
    • 8472

    As a long-time admirer of the works of Jean Sibelius, can I just say what a pleasure it was to hear the whole of the 1st movement of his 3rd symphony without a single trailer inserted at any point. I hope that the remaining movements are treated just as respectfully whenever they're broadcast.

    Comment

    • vinteuil
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 12842

      Originally posted by LMcD View Post
      As a long-time admirer of the works of Jean Sibelius, can I just say what a pleasure it was to hear the whole of the 1st movement of his 3rd symphony without a single trailer inserted at any point. I hope that the remaining movements are treated just as respectfully whenever they're broadcast.
      When Rossini was once told that they were performing act two of William Tell at l'Opéra in Paris, he apparently replied, mock incredulously, "What? All of it?" '

      .​

      Comment

      • LMcD
        Full Member
        • Sep 2017
        • 8472

        Originally posted by vinteuil View Post

        When Rossini was once told that they were performing act two of William Tell at l'Opéra in Paris, he apparently replied, mock incredulously, "What? All of it?" '

        .​

        Comment

        • Roger Webb
          Full Member
          • Feb 2024
          • 753

          Originally posted by french frank View Post

          Yes, in those days the BBC did have something of a magic-money tree. Since then it has been considerably depleted, with the aggravating factor that Radio 3 has plummeted down the BBC's financial pecking order. By changing their published method of advertising relative costs, the BBC makes Radio 3 still look very expensive whereas Radio 1 and 2 are extraoordinarily cheap - even though they gobble up more of the BBC budget.
          Do they measure it per capita, I wonder. If so the money spent on me personally seems both extravagantly lavish and mean....depending on what I'm listening to!

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30301

            Originally posted by Roger Webb View Post

            Do they measure it per capita, I wonder. If so the money spent on me personally seems both extravagantly lavish and mean....depending on what I'm listening to!
            Yes, they measure it by how much is spent per listener; also the cost per listener hour. This makes R3 with its small listenership and low listening hours (because its output is so varied) expensive, although of the five network radio stations - Rs 1-5 Live R3 gets the least number of millions, R1 and R2 needing a lot to pay for presenters' salaries.

            Just checked the accounts for 2022-23 (p152). They don't seem to give as much detail as they used to, but these are the figures for total cost and cost per listener hour:

            R1 £39m 2p
            R2 £50m 1p
            R3 £34m 5p
            R4 £88m 1p
            R5 £50m 3p
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • Roger Webb
              Full Member
              • Feb 2024
              • 753

              Originally posted by french frank View Post

              Yes, they measure it by how much is spent per listener; also the cost per listener hour. This makes R3 with its small listenership and low listening hours (because its output is so varied) expensive, although of the five network radio stations - Rs 1-5 Live R3 gets the least number of millions, R1 and R2 needing a lots to pay for presenters' salaries.

              Just checked the accounts for 2022-23 (p152). They don't seem to give as much detail as they used to, but these are the figures for total cost and cost per listener hour:

              R1 £39m 2p
              R2 £50m 1p
              R3 £34m 5p
              R4 £88m 1p
              R5 £50m 3p
              Well, looking at the figures a typical bean-counter would say they've at least to halve the 34m or double the listener hours to arrive at an average spend per capita. A rational human being might conclude that quality programmes (we'll leave that supposition dangling...to be discussed) might just cost a bit more!
              ​​​​​

              Comment

              • pastoralguy
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 7759

                Originally posted by french frank View Post

                R1 and R2 needing a lot to pay for presenters salaries 3p
                You mean Andrew McGregor doesn’t earn the same as Zoe Ball?!

                Comment

                • Ein Heldenleben
                  Full Member
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 6785

                  Originally posted by french frank View Post

                  Yes, they measure it by how much is spent per listener; also the cost per listener hour. This makes R3 with its small listenership and low listening hours (because its output is so varied) expensive, although of the five network radio stations - Rs 1-5 Live R3 gets the least number of millions, R1 and R2 needing a lot to pay for presenters' salaries.

                  Just checked the accounts for 2022-23 (p152). They don't seem to give as much detail as they used to, but these are the figures for total cost and cost per listener hour:

                  R1 £39m 2p
                  R2 £50m 1p
                  R3 £34m 5p
                  R4 £88m 1p
                  R5 £50m 3p
                  You have to be very careful with those figures as they don’t always include central overheads. The thing is network radio is as cheap as chips. A network TV doc can easily work out at 25 PENCE per viewer hour : say 1,000,000 viewers at a cost (excluding channel overheads ) of £250,000 per hour. 1 million is fast becoming a good 21.00 audience on BBC 2 or C4 whereas 20 years ago it would have been an unmitigated disaster.
                  Try costing out Match of The Day ( those highlights are pricey ) or a drama that costs a mill per hour and then flops. Or S4C programmes or BBC Alba - even though the budgets are small the audiences are often borderline unmeasurable. I reckon there are TV programmes going out for around a pound per viewer hour all the time.​

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30301

                    Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post

                    You have to be very careful with those figures as they don’t always include central overheads.
                    There used to be a breakdown of what that £34m for R3 was made up of, especially what was spent on content. There was also the spend per genre (but no one was interested in that so they gave up publishing it )

                    Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
                    The thing is network radio is as cheap as chips.
                    Much of it is, but as you have pointed out, even a play on R3 is going to be expensive compared with a CD sequence programme (with an R3 presenter!). Just as for R2 a programme presented by Zoe Ball is going to be 'more expensive' than one with some lesser light. Our point was that it didn't matter if a Drama on 3 only attracted 20,000 people if it was a classic play which would otherwise be unavailable for an audience to enjoy, possibly in their entire lifetime (such as next week's play by Lope which I've just posted about). How do you put a 'public value' on that? How do you factor in how many provincial theatres would be needed to take an audience of 20,000?
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • Ein Heldenleben
                      Full Member
                      • Apr 2014
                      • 6785

                      Originally posted by french frank View Post

                      There used to be a breakdown of what that £34m for R3 was made up of, especially what was spent on content. There was also the spend per genre (but no one was interested in that so they gave up publishing it )



                      Much of it is, but as you have pointed out, even a play on R3 is going to be expensive compared with a CD sequence programme (with an R3 presenter!). Just as for R2 a programme presented by Zoe Ball is going to be 'more expensive' than one with some lesser light. Our point was that it didn't matter if a Drama on 3 only attracted 20,000 people if it was a classic play which would otherwise be unavailable for an audience to enjoy, possibly in their entire lifetime (such as next week's play by Lope which I've just posted about). How do you put a 'public value' on that? How do you factor in how many provincial theatres would be needed to take an audience of 20,000?
                      all good arguments. You might well find that a Sunday Drama when you add on iPlayer hits does considerably better than 20,000 - but even that is the equivalent of 11 full Olivier theatre audiences. And the Olivier subsidy will be vastly more than 5p per seat hour if there is such a metric. Probably £5 to £10 per seat I would estimate.

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30301

                        Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
                        You might well find that a Sunday Drama when you add on iPlayer hits does considerably better than 20,000 - but even that is the equivalent of 11 full Olivier theatre audiences.
                        None of which would actually be putting on a peformance of the play in question anyway! It's a case of the cost of everything and the value of nothing as that Mr Wilde said.
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • Roger Webb
                          Full Member
                          • Feb 2024
                          • 753

                          Originally posted by french frank View Post

                          It was some while ago that the message was conveyed to R3 management that 'people' didn't really like the concert interval taken up with bits of music, especially with little connection to the main concert works. But, as usual ...
                          Any one like the actual concert taken up with bits, I'm listening opened- mouthed to this evening's 'concert'...BTW it's called Mozart: The mixtape.!!!

                          Played so far, the first three movements of the Hafner symphony - apparently the last movt. Is to played at the end of the concert! Each of the three movts. so far have been interrupted by Petroc interviewing somebody!

                          Most peculiar hand-over from 7 o'clock mixtape too, as if they had only gone over to Croydon just in time, missing out Petroc's intro. The orchestra was just starting...lucky those adverts didn't overrun!

                          What a mess.

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30301

                            "Mozart The Mixtape is a re-creation for our own times: "Imagine this. The year is 1783 and you’re a fashionable Viennese aristocrat, so of course you’ve heard of Mozart, the 27-year-old genius lighting up music halls across the continent. He might even be your piano teacher. Someone tells you that he’s got something new planned, so you show up to the palace theatre in your newest ‘fit. As the concert starts, you note that the Emperor is in attendance – a good sign. If you could, you’d livetweet the whole thing. It features many of Mozart’s greatest hits including the “Haffner” Symphony and Piano Concertos No.13 and No.5."

                            So which VIP is "in attendance" at this performance? The Culture Secretary?
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • Roger Webb
                              Full Member
                              • Feb 2024
                              • 753

                              Originally posted by french frank View Post
                              "Mozart The Mixtape is a re-creation for our own times: "Imagine this. The year is 1783 and you’re a fashionable Viennese aristocrat, so of course you’ve heard of Mozart, the 27-year-old genius lighting up music halls across the continent. He might even be your piano teacher. Someone tells you that he’s got something new planned, so you show up to the palace theatre in your newest ‘fit. As the concert starts, you note that the Emperor is in attendance – a good sign. If you could, you’d livetweet the whole thing. It features many of Mozart’s greatest hits including the “Haffner” Symphony and Piano Concertos No.13 and No.5."

                              So which VIP is "in attendance" at this performance? The Culture Secretary?
                              Yes, that's the blurb that got me interested too! But only because I look every night to see what the evening concert offers - to see if it's worth the switch-over from France Musique or WDR 3, whose concerts handily start at 7 o'clock. Imogene Cooper still sounds good though - I remember her with the BSO and Harry Blech, oh, 45 years ago...what would he ( the founder of The London Mozart Players) have thought of this sort of thing? Probably have 'live-tweeted' the whole thing.

                              Comment

                              • LMcD
                                Full Member
                                • Sep 2017
                                • 8472

                                Originally posted by Roger Webb View Post

                                Any one like the actual concert taken up with bits, I'm listening opened- mouthed to this evening's 'concert'...BTW it's called Mozart: The mixtape.!!!

                                Played so far, the first three movements of the Hafner symphony - apparently the last movt. Is to played at the end of the concert! Each of the three movts. so far have been interrupted by Petroc interviewing somebody!

                                Most peculiar hand-over from 7 o'clock mixtape too, as if they had only gone over to Croydon just in time, missing out Petroc's intro. The orchestra was just starting...lucky those adverts didn't overrun!

                                What a mess.
                                The handover wasn't live - the concert was recorded a few days ago.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X