Not sure my pop analogy was right, but here goes...
These pieces are so rhythmically precise that, perversely, any slight variation is noticeable. This is a clear paradox. It is also why this music (so slight and ephemeral in many ways) is susceptible to significant interpretation.
Kleiber was thus of the view that it is music more difficult to conduct than many much longer pieces in the repertory.
These pieces are so rhythmically precise that, perversely, any slight variation is noticeable. This is a clear paradox. It is also why this music (so slight and ephemeral in many ways) is susceptible to significant interpretation.
Kleiber was thus of the view that it is music more difficult to conduct than many much longer pieces in the repertory.
Comment