Originally posted by ahinton
View Post
International Women's Day: Tuesday 8 March
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostIf you're (say) a novelist you would be dealing more-or-less solely with a publisher, whereas being a composer means you are much more out in the world, networking on many levels? Without men as intercessioners, how would this have been seen?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Postbeing a composer means you are much more out in the world
Comment
-
-
One of the reasons for the decline of women composers may be something to do with the development of the concept of the clear division between public and private. Somewhere along the way, as the western nations became more intent upon nation building (colonising the new world rather than fighting amongst themselves) the military, equal men, became all the important public figures, whereas women were pushed back into the domestic / private world. Unlike novels which were intended for a private pleasure, music to be regarded with any importance, it needed to be a public event for which the central figure / the composer had to be a man. Even for domestic music making, unless it was entirely private (family only), the host would have chosen the music composed by known / male composers.
Or something to the effect. I’m afraid I can’t present the reference but the concept of public / private division is an established theory somewhere. Its link to music and composers is just my guess.Last edited by doversoul1; 09-03-16, 20:59.
Comment
-
-
Yes - and there was also the widespread conservative/puritanical moral backlash in Europe after the French Revolution, and particularly after Waterloo. Whilst Napoleon himself retracted many of the rights and liberties that women had won for themselves during the Revolution, and anything resembling social reform was - at best - disapproved of after 1815. This can be seen in the change of the "Nation's Hero" in Britain from the sexually active Nelson to the repressed and repressive Wellington. The more liberal attitudes of the 1790s and 1800s - in which Jane Austen could first declare her work to be "by a lady" and then under her own name - were replaced in the 1820s and 30s by the work of George Sand, George Eliot, and the Bell Brothers.
The need to avoid ideas that might disrupt the social fabric (as revealed also in Beethoven's post-Metternich conversation books) play a significant part in the repression of women's persuing anything other than what was (/is!) considered their traditional/"natural" "duties" - except as amateurs, dilettantes ... or "freaks".
And what is particularly pernicious and insidious is that these attitudes were not just adopted by nasty, vindictive men in positions of power, but taken for granted by all but the fringes of political thought. (I'm reading Bleak House, the only novel IIRC by Dickens in which he attempted writing in the persona of a woman. The casual assumptions with which he expected his readers to accept as profound and universal truths are truly jaw-dropping.)[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostYes, that's true. But the entirety of their artistic production could be carried out within the home.
The moment a woman artist is out in the world, sexual availability (welcomed or enforced) comes into play
What makes you think "man artists" are any different?
What's your view of female 'groupies', for instance?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by doversoul View PostUnlike novels which were intended for a private pleasure, music to be regarded with any importance, it needed to be a public event
Where I would agree with you is in the development of the concept of public versus private performance. When public concerts became more prominent it perhaps became more difficult for women to get their music performed; when the most music was heard in a domestic setting it would have been easier.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostWhere I would agree with you is in the development of the concept of public versus private performance. When public concerts became more prominent it perhaps became more difficult for women to get their music performed; when the most music was heard in a domestic setting it would have been easier.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment