Originally posted by Mary Chambers
View Post
BBC Young Musician 2014
Collapse
X
-
I agree Mary....I was surprised to find the whole thing on R3 while I was driving to collect someone. There are obviously personal preferences involved here, but Martin's performance could easily have been that of a 'pro' as it came over the airwaves. (Sorry to disagree Calibs!) Someone mentioned lack of power somewhere. I doubt that's the Fazioli, which IMHO, cuts the same mustard as a Steinway. Martin will no doubt develop more power as he matures....but (again IMHO) too many pianists hit the piano too hard these days. No names.
I certainly would not want to detract from any of the finalists' achievements whatever their choice of repertoire, body gyrations, facial expressions or whatever. It's a shame in some ways that the Grand Final could not just be a Grand Concert where those who have made it simply perform without the element of competition.
Comment
-
-
Clearly the whole concept of a concerto-filled final needs to be re-thought. I'm not much for Rachmaninov, but the winner's piece seemed to me streets ahead of his competitors. The percussion "concerto" was filled with musical cliché and the poor recorder-player had to make do with a second-rate piece written for another instrument.
There's lots of more interesting music, old and new, for both of those instruments, but not in the "concerto" box (and not needing the BBCSSO).
Comment
-
-
I checked the details of Stanley's quotation online. How I wish I hadn't! I stumbled on something called No Fear Shakespeare, which 'translates' the texts. Thus "There lies your love" becomes "There's your boyfriend, sleeping right over there". Horrible fascination may lead me to read more.
Off-topic. I know. Sorry.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mary Chambers View PostI checked the details of Stanley's quotation online. How I wish I hadn't! I stumbled on something called No Fear Shakespeare, which 'translates' the texts. Thus "There lies your love" becomes "There's your boyfriend, sleeping right over there". Horrible fascination may lead me to read more.
Off-topic. I know. Sorry.
Comment
-
-
I don't understand how adjudication works in this competition as others have remarked how on earth do you find a yardstick that fairly asseses the relative merits, but I'm not that bothered since all three finalists and many who didn't make the final gave much listening pleasure and will go on to fulfilling musical lives.
By the way, I quite enjoy players/conductors/singers who fail the impassivity test since it mirrors my own reactions to music!!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by verismissimo View PostClearly the whole concept of a concerto-filled final needs to be re-thought. I'm not much for Rachmaninov, but the winner's piece seemed to me streets ahead of his competitors. The percussion "concerto" was filled with musical cliché and the poor recorder-player had to make do with a second-rate piece written for another instrument.
Like many others here I found it almost impossible to compare apples, pears and bananas as it were in the three performances. But there was another factor that hasn't IIRC been mentioned here. In the Rachmaninov most of us here will have had a pretty good idea of how the piece goes, and probably some recollection of benchmark performances. So no doubt did the judges. For the other two works most of us lacked any such experience. OK, the judges had the score (studied well in advance?) but probably like us, no experience of other performances.
Not sure which category gave the performer the advantage though. Superficially it should be those playing unknown works (no great performances to fail against), but I felt far more secure in making an assessment of the Rackers. The others were somehow unrooted, literally but not metaphorically 'incomparable'.
Have to admit that I have a serious problem with most percussion concertos anyway - great theatre watching the performance, but little to hold the attention musically. And the recorder work here was only a little better. So for me it was probably always going to be the pianist, even though we're obviously supposed to be rating the performance, not the work played Does this ring bells with others?I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
I know what you mean about percussion, Kingfisher, especially with the 'tremolando' marimba which seems completely to dominate any work of that genre. But the musicianship and incredible rhythmic coordination of all the percussion finalists, and of course of the exceptional young lad in the Grand Final, cannot be denied. I remember being mesmerised by one of the girl percussion finalists who did a truly remarkable side-drum solo...but as you say, how do you compare different fruits ?
Comment
-
Comment