It rather resembles van Beethoven's last quartettes, in that their respective composers were unconstrained by considerations of any audience's convenience or comprehension, but developed their invention freely in a pure and utterly serious style. As usual Sydney Grew the Elder our most astute writer on music puts it so well: "Here Bach wrote as an abstract artist, with no thought of gain or glory."
The word "seminal" is often bandied about, but indeed the Art of Fugue contains a number of seeds that even after two and a half centuries have not yet germinated. "The Art of Bach the master, old, wise, and experienced almost beyond belief, was Miltonic in majesty, ease, and certainty, and remains unsurpassed." And as Sydney Grew continues, "Here domains were entered which had previously been contemplated only theoretically." The desperate scrabblings of to-day's puny modernists seem only laughable in comparison do not they.
There are many recordings, for many different instrumental combinations. One of the most rewarding we have found to be that of the Juilliard Quartette.
What are other Members' views on this staggering work?
The word "seminal" is often bandied about, but indeed the Art of Fugue contains a number of seeds that even after two and a half centuries have not yet germinated. "The Art of Bach the master, old, wise, and experienced almost beyond belief, was Miltonic in majesty, ease, and certainty, and remains unsurpassed." And as Sydney Grew continues, "Here domains were entered which had previously been contemplated only theoretically." The desperate scrabblings of to-day's puny modernists seem only laughable in comparison do not they.
There are many recordings, for many different instrumental combinations. One of the most rewarding we have found to be that of the Juilliard Quartette.
What are other Members' views on this staggering work?
Comment