I really think forum members should write and make their views known about this. I know the 'explanation' given is 'a (much) reduced budget' - okay, 'nothing Radio 3 can do', so write to the Director General.
Consider this: in the last round of stringency budget cuts (2013/14 compared with 2011/12, Radio 1 has had an extra £3.3m - almost a 9% increase - and Radio 3 has had £300,000 - less than a 1% increase over 2 years, making its content now the least expensive of the three network music stations (in fact, the least expensive of any of the 5 network radio stations).
Why? Because stations based on research and erudition cost more than the BBC is prepared to pay for? Because audiences 'don't want' classical music any more? Because 'popular music' boosts the BBC radio ratings and clobbers the commercial rivals?
If anyone's interested in 'Déjà lu', this was RW's blog last time he savaged the schedules. And just think - it's got worse since then
I don't know what the DG's address is. Try:
Lord Hall
BBC Director General
Broadcasting House
Portland Place
London W1A 1AA
Consider this: in the last round of stringency budget cuts (2013/14 compared with 2011/12, Radio 1 has had an extra £3.3m - almost a 9% increase - and Radio 3 has had £300,000 - less than a 1% increase over 2 years, making its content now the least expensive of the three network music stations (in fact, the least expensive of any of the 5 network radio stations).
Why? Because stations based on research and erudition cost more than the BBC is prepared to pay for? Because audiences 'don't want' classical music any more? Because 'popular music' boosts the BBC radio ratings and clobbers the commercial rivals?
If anyone's interested in 'Déjà lu', this was RW's blog last time he savaged the schedules. And just think - it's got worse since then
I don't know what the DG's address is. Try:
Lord Hall
BBC Director General
Broadcasting House
Portland Place
London W1A 1AA
Comment