If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
As good as Guillon is, I don't think there is any evidence that lute songs were sung by counter-tenors during the 1590s to 1620s. That's really another way of saying that, for my tastes, there are too many counter-tenor recordings of English lute songs being issued lately and not enough by tenors and basses (sopranos are quite well represented, female altos less so). The Davies/Dunford is ruined a little by Dunford's use of an inappropriate lute (single-strung archlute instead of a double-strung, 7-course alto lute, and thus too big, loud and coarse) as well as by some rather inappropriate ornamentation by Davies. And, I agree, his diction is a little wanting.
The Guillon/Bellocq suffers from an even less appropriate lute - a modern guitar/lute hybrid called "liuto forte" (many parts of which are patented, I understand), which has a prolonged sustain like a guitar which (I think) undermines the superb playing of the lutenist, Eric Bellocq.
Indeed the words are most important. I often think of Thomas Campion who wrote much of his own text (I don't know if Dowland was poetically inclined) and he must surely have wanted his words to be clearly heard. I was lucky enough to know Robert Spencer, the lutenist (who has now sadly died) and he would often play and sing (in a baritone register) at private gatherings and social occasions. He would be the first to admit that his was not a great voice, BUT he 'told the story' and frankly I felt in my bones his sort of rendition was all the more affecting. I think many countertenors concentrate on beauty of sound. Deller did for certain, but he also managed to bring great expressiveness to his Dowland recordings. He had certain mannerisms (e.g. that diminuendo-ing on high notes) but his diction was pretty good.
Thanks ardcarp. And welcome, Christopher Pontifex! Good to hear from you. Interesting re the anachronistic lute, yes I was puzzled by the photo in the CD notes, the lute seems to have at least 3 diapasons which seems excessive for the period. Re Dowland's words, I quote from Diana Poulton, the leading authority on Dowland (whom I was glad to hear being name-checked by Dr Gibson the other day )
In recent years [>1970-odd] the authorship of a number of the poems used by Dowland has been traced, but many remain where, so far, no identification has been made....Some of these may possibly have been provided by his distinguished patrons, In addition to the few really fine poets in the Queen's immediate circle, many of the courtiers were capable of writing respectable verse, although convention demanded anonymity except among the author's closest friends. This dislike of publicity among the nobility and gentry concerning their poetic works is responsible for much of the unclaimed verse of the period not only in the lutenist song-books, but in the madrigal collections as well. The same type of author may also have produced the translations from Italian lyrics occasionally used by composers of the time.
The suggestion has sometimes been put forward that Dowland himself wrote some of the poems he set to music. Although there is no definite evidence to prove his authorship of any stanzas in the song-books he certainly showed he could write verse by the commendatory poems he contributed to his friends' publications. These, however, mostly fall far below the level attained by many of the pyrics he made use of.
She discusses the evidence for the authorship of "Now O Now", both tune and poem, at some length
CP, thanks for those scholarly comments! I would just chip in that, from Saturday's programme, we could surmise that there was no single 'right' way of performing any of Dowland's music, and it can probably stand quite a bit of diverse treatment. There is of course the wider issue of whether, in days of yore, countertenors were falsettists or just high tenors....but that's opening another can of worms.
I have already taken the plunge.. This is in my opinion a very fine recording and I have been enjoying allot over the past week.
Same here
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
and
Vivaldi: Concertos for 2 Cellos
Julian Lloyd Webber (cello), Jiaxin Lloyd Webber (cello)
European Union Chamber Orchestra, Hans-Peter Hofmann
(could this be our coco…?)
Interesting list. I already have the Hewitt Art of the Fugue I am also interested in Michaela Petri's CD. So will listen for those. The rest especially the Saxophone transcription leave me cold.
I was greatly intrigued by the dramatic performances of the Bach Violin Concertos - quite unlike other recordings I know (Menuhin/Enescu, Grimieaux, Kujiken & Manze) but, on the evidence of the excerpts played this morning, entirely convincing readings of the works.
But, did I misunderstand, or did they really say that you get more Music if you buy the Download version than on the CD? Is this a new phenomenon, or have I just missed the boat about such things?
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment