Originally posted by Richard Barrett
View Post
Antonio Lucio Vivaldi
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostIt's in Michael Talbot's Vivaldi monograph, which is an interesting book for things like this but otherwise a bit limited, presumably for reasons of keeping its overall size down.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MickyD View PostI seem to remember (way back in the 80s) a much larger and luxurious Vivaldi book by Michael Talbot. Or am I imagining it?
... described here as a "2013 reprint"?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Not "from back in the '80s", though.
The list of publications in Professor Talbot's CV does not suggest that he authored any book matching MickyD's description in the 1980s (the "Dent" publication from 1978 is the Master Musicians volume):
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
I've built up a fair old pile of Vivaldi discs over the last 40 yrs. When I saw a CD described as 'Late violin concertos' for not very much money I was sufficiently intrigued to buy, at the same time remarking to a friend that I wondered how late Vivaldi would match up to op106 or 131
Well, I think I see the point of the label, seems Vivaldi did get up to something different in his old age, develop a new style much less bothered about regularity, always being pleasant and never saying boo to a goose, more concerned to do something different and 'If I wanna say it I'll say it, if you don't like it you know what you can do'.
Or has the label on the tin made me hear something that isn't there???
This is the disc
I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View PostI've built up a fair old pile of Vivaldi discs over the last 40 yrs. When I saw a CD described as 'Late violin concertos' for not very much money I was sufficiently intrigued to buy, at the same time remarking to a friend that I wondered how late Vivaldi would match up to op106 or 131
Well, I think I see the point of the label, seems Vivaldi did get up to something different in his old age, develop a new style much less bothered about regularity, always being pleasant and never saying boo to a goose, more concerned to do something different and 'If I wanna say it I'll say it, if you don't like it you know what you can do'.
Or has the label on the tin made me hear something that isn't there???
This is the disc
You might also like -
and
Comment
-
-
You don't half like to fill up my screen, BeefO.
I have that CD but I haven't listened to it yet.
As for the "earlier" Vivaldi "never saying boo to a goose", I wouldn't agree. His L'Estro Armonico collection (published in 1711 but no doubt written over a longer period before that), for example, involves more variation in structure than most of the work that came later. Also there are his operas which are in many ways a lot less stereotyped in form and expression than the concertos. (And the concertos for cello and bassoon are often less "regular" than those for violin.) But indeed the "late" pieces are something else.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostYou don't half like to fill up my screen, BeefO.
I have that CD but I haven't listened to it yet.
As for the "earlier" Vivaldi "never saying boo to a goose", I wouldn't agree. His L'Estro Armonico collection (published in 1711 but no doubt written over a longer period before that), for example, involves more variation in structure than most of the work that came later. Also there are his operas which are in many ways a lot less stereotyped in form and expression than the concertos. (And the concertos for cello and bassoon are often less "regular" than those for violin.) But indeed the "late" pieces are something else.
Opus 3 & Opus 8 rock like Led Zep I & II.
(it's a great cover, so it deserves to be big (resizing takes too long))
Comment
-
Comment