Expecting historical accuracy from a Hollywood movie is bound to lead to disappointment. Ian and I agree that Gladiator II is not worth going to see, but for different reasons, first and foremost being that it didn’t need to be made, it doesn’t improve upon the original, rather it merely rehashes it. Scott’s Napoleon of last year was also historically inaccurate, but it failed principally for containing bad acting and a bad script. Two duds in a row is not a good legacy for a director with a previous strong record for making innovative and genre changing films. Perhaps he needs the money?
Films you've seen lately
Collapse
X
Comment