Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte
View Post
A Christmas Carol BBC1
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostExcept in so far as the writer himself would act the whole thing out to his paying public, with great gusto, doing all the voices and a lot of gestures. So, alas, there is a precedent![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostQuite possibly, but for those who will not 'read, mark and inwardly digest' the Dickens story, the message has to be got out in other ways?
What an indictment that it seems less like history and more like current reportage...
https://www.theguardian.com/society/...-tower-hamlets[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View PostYes, the Alastair Sim version is a delight
...
There was an interesting re-versioning of it on Talking Pictures yesterday - the 1961 Cash on Demand, with Peter Cushing (seldom better).
Episode 2 of the new one I found even more gripping than the first episode. The shape-shifting of the magnificent Serkis’s ghost, the magic lantern images transformed to visions, the back-story of mental, physical and sexual abuse. I find it an enthralling production.
And yes, Cash on Demand is a great little film! Never twigged the Christmas Carol undercurrent till now though!
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
A very thought provoking adaptation, very well done in almost all regards.
As somebody who has never read the original, it makes me want to read it. Which is as much as one can hope for.
I find that the bad language sits badly, but that is the modern world. A less is more approach would be preferable, but so it goes.
Interested in Cash on Demand from the comments above.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
A vivid account of the original, which had social comment at its heart. An updating to be more 'relevant' is wholly appropriate given that what is considered exploitative today may not have been so in the 19th century. The moral of the tale was respected with great style. Commentators elsewhere have felt it appropriate to comment on the fact that the the wife is mixed-race; humbug.
Comment
-
-
It takes a lot for me to 'suspend disbelief', especially in TV films. I don't know why. But here it was the simple point of keeping Victorian sets and costumes but using present-day script. I don't give a f*** about the bad language. It was just the mis-match. Maybe I should have tried harder...but there's so much else to be doing.
Comment
-
-
.
... I thought this was amazingly good. I need to watch the final episode again to re-experience what was going on, but the intensity of Scrooge, almost as an eighteenth century philosophe wishing to be consistent with his logically held beliefs, was compelling. And the difficult darkness of the ending, in his encounter with Mrs Cratchit, where he does not seek forgiveness after his horrendous moral 'experiment' was beautifully placed. And throughout, the visual skills were amazing - Tiny Tim crashing thro' the ice to float suspended above Scrooge in his room - tremendous. A much deeper and more interesting experience for me than Dickens's original.
.
Comment
-
Comment