Bodyguard BBC1 Sunday

Collapse
X
Collapse
more_options-1
Posts
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vinteuil
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 13172

    #16
    Originally posted by DracoM View Post
    Keeley Hawes?
    Keeley Hawes AND Gina McKee




    .

    Comment

    • DracoM
      Host
      • Mar 2007
      • 13022

      #17

      Comment

      • muzzer
        Full Member
        • Nov 2013
        • 1197

        #18
        Enjoyed this a lot, looking forward to this eveningโ€™s episode. Chuckled audibly at the Home Office being set in New Street Square, last seen in the disastrous Sweeney remake.

        Comment

        • Serial_Apologist
          Full Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 38145

          #19
          Originally posted by muzzer View Post
          Enjoyed this a lot, looking forward to this eveningโ€™s episode. Chuckled audibly at the Home Office being set in New Street Square, last seen in the disastrous Sweeney remake.
          Well spotted, and well remembered, muzzer!

          I figured the bonking scene would take place in episode 2!
          Last edited by Serial_Apologist; 27-08-18, 22:10.

          Comment

          • Pianorak
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 3129

            #20
            Just caught up with Episode 1. "I'm mixed race". - One way to stop a Chief Whip in his tracks. Clever line.
            My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)

            Comment

            • DracoM
              Host
              • Mar 2007
              • 13022

              #21
              Second epi: a tissue of disappointingly predictable and extended cliches, Jed..............oh dear.
              Staying with it, but.................
              Last edited by DracoM; 28-08-18, 16:09.

              Comment

              • LMcD
                Full Member
                • Sep 2017
                • 8905

                #22
                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                Well spotted, and well remembered, muzzer!

                I figured the bonking scene would take place in episode 2!
                It did have an air of inevitability about it, didn't it? But I shall stick with it!

                Comment

                • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                  Gone fishin'
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 30163

                  #23
                  Originally posted by LMcD View Post
                  It did have an air of inevitability about it, didn't it?
                  Yes - which is why I was hoping they'd avoid it: it would have been less clichรฉd, more convincing, and as far as I'm concerned, a damn sight sexier if they'd resisted the temptation. (Though I presume it's going to have some unavoidable significance to the plot development.)

                  But I shall stick with it!
                  Up to the heavy breathing, it had been great fun.
                  [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                  Comment

                  • vinteuil
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 13172

                    #24
                    .

                    ... o deary me, such a shame. It wd have been so much more stylish to have kept some sexual frisson and avoided the bonking. That beautiful moment in the earlier series of 'Unforgotten' when poor Sunny made an ill-advised move on Cassie, and we all cringed on our sofas - and the relief when it swerved away from that avenue.

                    Yes, it remains great fun. But plausibility has obviously been discarded as unnecessary. His leaving his chief responsibility - his post in the armour-plated bullet-proof limo with the Home Sec - to single-handedly storm the building and confront the shooter?

                    How was it that a bullet penetrated the limo to splatter the brains of the chauffeur - yet no other bullet attained its objective?

                    We may have known that the lorry speeding down the road had ill intention - but the staff and kiddies in the playground did not have that knowledge, and their rapid organized scarpering was not probable.

                    Looking forward to future stand-offs between Keeley Hawes and Gina McKee.

                    Enjoying the macchiavellian head of MI5.

                    .

                    Comment

                    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                      Gone fishin'
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 30163

                      #25
                      No budget for bullet-proof glass, it seems!

                      (Nor, it appears, for Security Officers to have a special, "work-only" Mobile Phone.)
                      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                      Comment

                      • LMcD
                        Full Member
                        • Sep 2017
                        • 8905

                        #26
                        Rather than concern myself with all these details and implausibilties, I'm happy to just let myself be swept along by it. My one gripe is the plethora of acronyms and abbreviations, but again I just let them sail over my head - they don't disturb the flow of the drama.

                        Comment

                        • Serial_Apologist
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 38145

                          #27
                          Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                          .

                          ... o deary me, such a shame. It wd have been so much more stylish to have kept some sexual frisson and avoided the bonking. That beautiful moment in the earlier series of 'Unforgotten' when poor Sunny made an ill-advised move on Cassie, and we all cringed on our sofas - and the relief when it swerved away from that avenue.

                          Yes, it remains great fun. But plausibility has obviously been discarded as unnecessary. His leaving his chief responsibility - his post in the armour-plated bullet-proof limo with the Home Sec - to single-handedly storm the building and confront the shooter?

                          How was it that a bullet penetrated the limo to splatter the brains of the chauffeur - yet no other bullet attained its objective?

                          We may have known that the lorry speeding down the road had ill intention - but the staff and kiddies in the playground did not have that knowledge, and their rapid organized scarpering was not probable.

                          Looking forward to future stand-offs between Keeley Hawes and Gina McKee.

                          Enjoying the macchiavellian head of MI5.

                          .
                          The taking of the building was personal, so that would corroborate with "issues". As to the driver's demise, his window might have been open - one would have to re-reel to that scene.

                          Comment

                          • Pianorak
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 3129

                            #28
                            Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                            . ... o deary me, such a shame. It wd have been so much more stylish to have kept some sexual frisson and avoided the bonking. . . .
                            This is BBC1 fare, not your BBC4!
                            My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)

                            Comment

                            • johncorrigan
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 10500

                              #29
                              I'm enjoying it with some reservations, but where it suffers in comparison to Line of Duty, in my opinion, is a likeable character or two.

                              Comment

                              • muzzer
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2013
                                • 1197

                                #30
                                I think you can only set so many hares running in the conspiracy theory stakes before straining the bounds of credibility too far...

                                Comment

                                Working...