Originally posted by ardcarp
View Post
One thing I (we?) don't know is if the players ever all have to play the same pieces in front of a judging team. That would perhaps at least reduce some of the uncertainty in the ranking. More or less the whole of the competition is based on false or dodgy comparisons and has been for years. How can one possibly compare a hosepipe player in an obscure piece by a reclusive hermit composer, against a digeridoo arrangement of Bruch's violin concerto (apologies to hosepipe and didgeridoo players here ...)? It is held that the choice of programmes is also a factor, reflecting the personal preferences and personalities of the performers - which I suppose is fair enough, but still makes comparisons difficult.
In the percussion section comparisons seem even more difficult than for the other parts of the competition, as the variety of instruments used seems to be far greater.
Also you mentioned "musicianship" and there is perhaps a related word "musical". While there are clearly some less competent players who might be deemed to lack musicianship or be less musical, I am not always convinced that being "musical" is an objective assessment. I think styles and fashions come into play, so one person might judge that another is not "musical", but another might have the opposite opinion.
Comment