I've just switched off the second episode of this series, about Catherine the Great, despite watching all of the episode last night on Peter the Great. I learned a great deal about Peter the Great, but tonight I could no longer tolerate the arch posturing of Lucy Worsley. She has a great deal to offer as a presenter; but it seems to me that she is - like so many presenters - here at the mercy of the production company and director who seem to want to make her, rather than the Romanovs, the centre of the programme. I wish the BBC would make producers of documentaries for BBC4 take their brief seriously and not let them tart the programme up as though it were some kind of talent show.
The Romanovs with Lucy Worsley
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostI've just switched off the second episode of this series, about Catherine the Great, despite watching all of the episode last night on Peter the Great. I learned a great deal about Peter the Great, but tonight I could no longer tolerate the arch posturing of Lucy Worsley. She has a great deal to offer as a presenter; but it seems to me that she is - like so many presenters - here at the mercy of the production company and director who seem to want to make her, rather than the Romanovs, the centre of the programme. I wish the BBC would make producers of documentaries for BBC4 take their brief seriously and not let them tart the programme up as though it were some kind of talent show.
I fully agree! I gave it ten minutes but can't bare to watch anymore. It's all about the presenter who in truth grates on me!
There was an interesting programme on yesterday on Radio 4 Extra presented by Roger Bolton. it was the story of the Codex Sinaiticus, the world's oldest bible, found in 1844 in a monastery in the Sinai Desert by Constantin von Tischendorf. It went to Russia and was sold in 1933 to the British Library by Stalin raise currency for the Soviet Government.Last edited by Stanfordian; 08-11-17, 20:48.
-
-
It'll be history according to the BBC, with the house face that fits.
Of course I'm suspicious of everything, ( or so I've been told on this forum) but then that is what studying history can do to a person.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
The other thing that dawned on me about Lucy Worsley's presentation is that she has a little habit of speaking about executions and similar grisly events with a theatrical relish, which reminded me of Miranda Richardson's portrayal of Elizabeth I in Blackadder II, an interpretation which Miranda Richardson had based on a hated pupil at her school.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostWhy can't all presenters be half as good as Sir David Attenborough or Christopher Trace?
Comment
-
-
Yes, but re-watching The Lost Princesses films last week made me yearn for the absence of an on-screen presenter. A voice-over is not only less distracting to the narrative, but the tone of that voice can be much more appropriately atmospheric. Will we ever see the likes of the Ken Russell's Elgar or Christopher Nupen's Sibelius again?
Comment
-
-
OK call me a spoil-sport, but re-watching The Lost Princesses films last week made me yearn for the absence of an on-screen presenter. A voice-over is not only less distracting to the narrative, but the tone of that voice can be much more appropriately atmospheric. Will we ever see the likes of the Ken Russell's Elgar or Christopher Nupen's Sibelius again?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ardcarp View PostOK call me a spoil-sport, but re-watching The Lost Princesses films last week made me yearn for the absence of an on-screen presenter. A voice-over is not only less distracting to the narrative, but the tone of that voice can be much more appropriately atmospheric. Will we ever see the likes of the Ken Russell's Elgar or Christopher Nupen's Sibelius again?
As far as history or science documentaries are concerned, there is the problem that television is essentially a narrative medium. Section A leads to section B followed by C in straightforward order for the most part. It takes about an hour to cover material which could appear on just a couple of pages in an article. Moreover, with printed information it is possible to qualify a statement where necessary. The reader can refer back to an earlier page, or read an alternative view. This is very difficult to do on television without detailed debate.
Lucy Worsley's films on the Romanov's presented a clear narrative with some nice pictures on the way, without too much resort to the dressing up box. Let's not get too censorious about it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostThe most engaging female professor presenting the recent TV series about the worldwide spread of humankind is my new hero in the world of presentation.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostNo good, I've googled and can't find anything. So, who is that, please?
.
.
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... Dr Roberts, I assume
I see Dr Roberts hails from Bristol.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment