Originally posted by smittims
View Post
I read "Ivanhoe" many years ago after going through a spell of reading anything of a medieval nature in the Penguin Classics series. As someone who reads shed loads of history books, I was put off by the inaccuracies in Scott's writing and the fact that it did not seem authentic in comprison with something like "Sir Gawain & the Green Knight." At the time I was reading loads of books about medieval England that "Ivanhoe" seemed almost laughable and was full of cliches.
As a rule, I have a very wide taste in writing whether it is about birdwatching, history / arcaheology, football , etc. The variety in fiction is even broader and I am far less critical than I used to be about contemporary fiction writers. It is interesting how more "robust" fiction writers are about histry these days. For my money, the best recent historical novels have been Philip Kerr's Bernie Gunther series which are noir crime novels either set in Nazi Germany or about the onsequences of the Nazis. The reserach is spot on but the dialogue is really sharp so that you ultimately emphasize with Bernie Gunther. Other historical novels by the likes of Robert Harris and Andrew Taylor can be well reseached but I am not convinced that either are as good as Kerr as a writer. For my money, Scott's novels are of their time and what you are reading is a romanticised version of Medieval Britain that is seen through a Victorian prism. If you approach Ivanhoe from a historical perspective, I feel that the books comes up very short. There are 19th century writers like Dickens, Balzac and Zola whose books I have enjoyed. I never felt compelled to return to Scott after Ivanhoe not so much for the fact it was a bit overblown but more because Ivanhoe is so inaccurate.
Another historical writer I was prompted to read recently was George MacDonald Fraser whose "Flashman" novel is another example of some brilliant historical research. It was struck as just how good a historian Fraser was but then learned that it might not have been quote the satire it was intended to be. I believe it was the historian SaulDavid who interviewed Fraser and found that he held the kind of right wing views that are not really acceptable in 2023. Reading this book back in the summer, the interview changed my perception of the book which is something of an uncomfortable read with the casual acceptance of racism and violence towards women. My enjoyment was also dented by the fact that anyone failiar with Victorian military history will probably guess the ending of each book. However, like the Scott, this is historical fiction which perhaps tells us more of the social attitudes of the time as opposed to the era in which they are sent. A strong whiff of thr 1960s pervades the Flashman books just as the dreaming nostalgia of the Victorians where the brutality and politcal realities of the time were sugar coated and romantacized.
Comment