What are you reading now?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • richardfinegold
    replied
    Originally posted by LMcD View Post
    Just started John Updike's 'Terrorist'
    I read that. I always enjoyed Updike but remember thinking he was a bit out of his depth there

    Leave a comment:


  • smittims
    replied
    I remember Paul Foot's fearless writings. We need more people like him today.

    I'm re-reading Smoke. one of Turgenev's shorter novels , about a man whose life is turned upside down by the reappearance of a first love . I find more and more in Turgenev every time I re-read him. He was much admired by other novelists.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jazzrook
    replied
    Margaret Renn’s recent biography of the great investigative journalist and revolutionary socialist, Paul Foot:

    As her biography of Paul Foot is launched, Margaret Renn discusses his legacy as an investigative journalist. His notable columns appeared in Private Eye, So...


    JR

    Leave a comment:


  • LMcD
    replied
    Just started John Updike's 'Terrorist'

    Leave a comment:


  • smittims
    replied
    Lady Anna, one of Anthony Trollope's less-well-known novels , dating from 1874, after Phineas Redux.

    Unusualy for Trollope it has only one plot. Usially there are at least two; it's a familiar story of a wronged heiress contesting a will and finding love,etc. but what made me post this is the type face for this Oxford World Classics reprint. It is notoceably larger than normal , and seems to be an enlargement of the old miniature World's Classics hardbacks, if you remember them; they were much on sale inthe 1970s.

    This set me thinking about cheap reprints. Does anyone remember Heron Books, who used to advertise on the backs of magazines, tempting you to subscribe to a whole series of what looked like leather-bound 'fine editions' but which were actually laquered paper and card , and usually reprints of 19th-century editions. A neighbour of mine had shelves full of them , which sadly he never got around to reading.

    Leave a comment:


  • smittims
    replied
    Richard III, to follow my re-reading of the Henry VI plays. On ething I hadn't appreciated before was the variety of writing in these plays, which of course has given rise to much speculation about joint authorship , especially in Henry VI part One.

    These plays have had many different attempts ot interrpet them on stage, including the very realistic TV version with Bendict Cumberbatch. Reading them again convinces me that I would prefer a more ritualistic, symbolic approach. Trying to put two armies on one stage is doomed to failure, as Shakepeare admits in the prologue to Henry V. But the verse is fascinating and would repay being brought into relief by a less active staging.

    Leave a comment:


  • AHR
    replied
    'Injury Time' by D. J. Enright. I knew him only as a poet so this, part journal, part memoir, part splendidly in defence of language, has been quite a discovery.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pianorak
    replied
    Michel Barnier: My Secret Brexit Diary. Fascinating trip down memory lane. Somwhow seems like ancient and modern history rolled into one.

    Leave a comment:


  • gradus
    replied
    Back to Evelyn Waugh after a long gap, Vile Bodies remains very funny but I found Put out more Flags a bit flat although being EW there are always smiles to be had.

    Leave a comment:


  • smittims
    replied
    see my R3 jazz over New Year above. I agree.

    Leave a comment:


  • DracoM
    replied
    Re-iterating my support for the quiet, finely narrated 'In the Heart of the Country' by JM Coetzee.
    Truly worth reading and re-reading. An author I have been delighted to follow for years.

    Leave a comment:


  • smittims
    replied
    A much-loved rarity: Commonplace, a novella by Christina Rossetti. A quiet family drama, it would make an excellent BBC costume mini-series. Like Margaret Drabble more recently , Rossetti had the art of writing from a woman's perspective without sounding like a ranting feminist, and thus has something to offer the male reader.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pulcinella
    replied
    Originally posted by Historian View Post

    That's another example: I loved Moby Dick but could see how many others might find it impossible to get along with.
    Sounds like you and my friend would really hit it off!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pulcinella
    replied
    Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post

    If nothing else, Moby Dick is memorable for the first chapter. How many people wake up sharing a bed with a cannibal?
    Very true!

    Leave a comment:


  • richardfinegold
    replied
    Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post

    I felt bad, as it was given to me by a work colleague, whose favourite book (closely followed by Moby Dick, another I struggled with) it was.
    As you say, all very individual.
    If nothing else, Moby Dick is memorable for the first chapter. How many people wake up sharing a bed with a cannibal?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X