I'm baffled. Just what is about Alfred Hitchcock's film Vertigo which makes it the centre of so much enthusiasm ?
I recorded and watched it a couple of nights ago in what is a definitive restored print with a superbly mastered soundtrack which did justice to both the dialogue and Bernard Herrmann's music. That said, I was once again bored to tears.
I wanted to see the film after a gap of some years because I thought that all the critical praise must mean something, so I'd give it another go.The glacial pace and solemnity fails to disguise the ridiculous twists of the plot. James Stewart is his usual admirable self, but Kim Novack is almost totally unconvincing, walking through the part as if under an anaesthetic. The pictures of San Francisco are nice though.
Perhaps this sort of thing only appeals to heterosexuals?
As for the scene at the Golden Gate Bridge, the send up by Mel Brooks in High Anxiety was much more fun
I recorded and watched it a couple of nights ago in what is a definitive restored print with a superbly mastered soundtrack which did justice to both the dialogue and Bernard Herrmann's music. That said, I was once again bored to tears.
I wanted to see the film after a gap of some years because I thought that all the critical praise must mean something, so I'd give it another go.The glacial pace and solemnity fails to disguise the ridiculous twists of the plot. James Stewart is his usual admirable self, but Kim Novack is almost totally unconvincing, walking through the part as if under an anaesthetic. The pictures of San Francisco are nice though.
Perhaps this sort of thing only appeals to heterosexuals?
As for the scene at the Golden Gate Bridge, the send up by Mel Brooks in High Anxiety was much more fun
Comment