The Future of the BBC

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrGongGong
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 18357

    Some hilarious (???) comments after this article ('why oh why oh why' is the Independent infected by Kippertrolls?)

    A BBC Trust review had found a “sizeable crossover” between audiences for the two stations and steps have been taken to try to stop their content overlapping
    (referring to R1 & 2)

    It's MUSIC FFS it's ALL CONNECTED and "overlapping"

    from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-10393819.html

    Comment

    • Dave2002
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 18016

      Someone called Megan Bentall from 38 Degrees has been encouraging me to sign a petition re the BBC. This is part of a message I received earlier today.

      So far, the government thinks they can tear our BBC apart by stealth - slowly slipping in cuts and changing the rules. But if hundreds of thousands of us create a huge public outcry now, we can show David Cameron it'd be a political disaster to destroy our BBC [3].
      Click here to sign the petition to save our BBC now - it takes 10 seconds to sign:

      I've signed the petition to protect our BBC - it's under attack from our government. Please join in the call on David Cameron to keep our BBC independent and give it the resources it needs.


      From the Archers, to 6 Music, to Sherlock and Blue Peter, there's a part of the BBC that we all love. The BBC website is often the first place we go to for news that we can trust.
      I am concerned that the emphasis seems to be to preserve "exciting" and "award-winning" programmes such as Strictly etc.

      Others may have received similar messages.

      The "reference list" at the end might be useful - I've not checked it out yet:

      1] Sky News: BBC Braced For Government's Cuts Announcement:

      Yahoo! news: BBC warning as John Whittingdale unveils Government paper on future service:

      [2] Daily Mail: Revealed: David Cameron's four secret meetings with Rupert Murdoch that he didn't disclose:
      The Commons heard that Mr Murdoch’s submissions to the Leveson Inquiry revealed four more meetings with the Prime Minister, on top of the one that Mr Cameron has admitted, since the 2010 general election.

      [3] The Guardian: Nick Robinson: Cameron threatened to close down BBC on election bus:
      BBC political editor says it is hard to know if PM’s comments were a joke or veiled threat but that they added to pressure felt by corporation’s staff

      The Telegraph: Tories go to war with the BBC:
      David Cameron, infuriated by the corporation's election coverage, appoints BBC critic John Whittingdale to "sort out the BBC" ahead of the royal charter review next year

      [4] 38 Degrees Blog: Victory - Murdoch withdraws BSkyB bid:

      [5] 38 Degrees Blog: Flashmob outside the BBC:

      [6] Portland Communications: Soft power 30 ranking:
      Of course this is slightly political ....

      Comment

      • MrGongGong
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 18357

        Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
        Of course this is slightly political ....


        So lets watch all the Bufton Tuftons who were delighted at the election result start to realise that they are likely to lose Ambridge, Test Match Special, CE, The Proms etc etc

        Never mind, that's what "we" apparently want

        Comment

        • Dave2002
          Full Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 18016

          Mr GG

          Better watch out - we'll be banished to outer darkness, or Room 101!

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rqID3X4vqg for example.

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30292

            Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
            So lets watch all the Bufton Tuftons who were delighted at the election result start to realise that they are likely to lose Ambridge, Test Match Special, CE, The Proms etc etc

            Never mind, that's what "we" apparently want
            It shows your prejudices that people who like what, apparently, you don't like are Bufton Tuftons.

            I just did a quick check of Rajar - there are about 300 radio stations in the UK, including local/regional ones, the vast majority catering for some flavour of popular music. team describes Radio 2 as 'MOR': that is, arguably, what the BBC should NOT cover. Leave it to Saga Radio.
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • teamsaint
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 25209

              Originally posted by french frank View Post
              It shows your prejudices that people who like what, apparently, you don't like are Bufton Tuftons.

              I just did a quick check of Rajar - there are about 300 radio stations in the UK, including local/regional ones, the vast majority catering for some flavour of popular music. team describes Radio 2 as 'MOR': that is, arguably, what the BBC should NOT cover. Leave it to Saga Radio.
              Well my MOR is another persons cutting edge....and vice versa.
              My point was that the commercial sector does this worse, and in a less popular way than R2, which also offers some genuine public service content, effectively cross subsidised by the Chris Evans and Simon mayo shows.

              One might make a similar " leave it to the commercials" argument about CFM and R3.
              The answer of course is to leave Radios 1 to 4, all of which do, can and should provide something really distinctive, good quality , valued and at really rather modest cost.
              I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

              I am not a number, I am a free man.

              Comment

              • Dave2002
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 18016

                Re msg 197, I ought incidentally to mention that at the time of writing I have not signed the petition suggested by 38 Degrees.

                While I may agree with some of the aims, and that there are some problems pointed out by the lobbying organisation, it does not always follow that I will sign up to very simplistic approaches without a more detailed analysis, and perhaps a more personal form of response to those who can influence outcomes.

                I put up that post for information as much as anything, and it does seem to be becoming relevant today.

                Comment

                • MrGongGong
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 18357

                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  It shows your prejudices that people who like what, apparently, you don't like are Bufton Tuftons.
                  I"m a great fan of TA (though I wish they would kill off Peggy)
                  The Proms is a wonderful thing that we should look after and not submit to market forces

                  It's the smug Toryism that I don't like NOT the "niche" outputs of the BBC

                  Comment

                  • MrGongGong
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 18357

                    Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                    Mr GG

                    Better watch out - we'll be banished to outer darkness, or Room 101!
                    .
                    I'm already in there matey

                    Comment

                    • french frank
                      Administrator/Moderator
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 30292

                      Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                      and at really rather modest cost.
                      Tell that to the commercials!
                      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                      Comment

                      • teamsaint
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 25209

                        Originally posted by french frank View Post
                        Tell that to the commercials!
                        probably a fair comment....but....but.....
                        compare to cost of TV....and BBC radio's reach.... ( I'll bet there would be a gold rush to buy R1/R2 almost whatever the cost base).
                        I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                        I am not a number, I am a free man.

                        Comment

                        • french frank
                          Administrator/Moderator
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 30292

                          The thing about the BBC's expenditure on 'youth services (cut out R2 in that!) is that it's mainly strategic. Not just a question of providing for younger audiences, but it's the quantity: so children's television costs £140m in total, compared with BBC Four's £63m; and BBC Three takes another £114m. BBC One and BBC Two take £2bn. Popular music on network radio takes £150m. The strategy is that the larger the quantity of popular entertainment, the bigger the audiences you get and therefore better value. Which disregards how much it all costs in the first place.
                          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30292

                            Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                            The first thing that strikes me is that the suggestion that R1 and R2 seems to be one of the first things " put out there".
                            Getting back to this point: page 23 of the Green Paper says: "A recent example is the BBC Trust’s report which found a sizeable crossover in audiences for Radio 1 and Radio 2."

                            That might also be an argument that Radio 3 isn't distinctive enough from CFM, with 45%(?) of Radio 3's listeners also listening to CFM. If those listeners are satisfied with CFM, let Radio 3 move away to become LESS attractive to those listeners, rather than giving them a choice of two stations (and other listeners nothing).
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • Frances_iom
                              Full Member
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 2413

                              Originally posted by french frank View Post
                              ...
                              That might also be an argument that Radio 3 isn't distinctive enough from CFM, with 45%(?) of Radio 3's listeners also listening to CFM. ....
                              whilst I applaud your sentiment I would require more details of this 45% - eg if it was measured during Wodger's demolition of evening concert period when CFm offers R3-like concert in the evening then this might well explain it.

                              Comment

                              • teamsaint
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 25209

                                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                                Getting back to this point: page 23 of the Green Paper says: "A recent example is the BBC Trust’s report which found a sizeable crossover in audiences for Radio 1 and Radio 2."

                                That might also be an argument that Radio 3 isn't distinctive enough from CFM, with 45%(?) of Radio 3's listeners also listening to CFM. If those listeners are satisfied with CFM, let Radio 3 move away to become LESS attractive to those listeners, rather than giving them a choice of two stations (and other listeners nothing).
                                Probably a case of finding what you are looking for, if you do enough surveys, and ask enough questions.

                                The same trust report also points out elsewhere that there is close to no crossover between the music played on R1 and R2.
                                all of which proves.....what....?
                                I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                                I am not a number, I am a free man.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X