Thanks for that explanation, Alpie.
Don't Stop the Music - Channel 4
Collapse
X
-
Calling the old O level "musicology" is a bit of a joke
BUT it makes the point that music wasn't considered a practical subject
what we did loose was critical listening as part of understanding music
BUT
what so many of these things seem to miss is the purpose of school in the first place !
Surely school is the one place where you, as a child, will encounter things you wouldn't find elsewhere ?
I frequently work with A level students who could roughly be divided into 2 groups
1: Those who play orchestral instruments and take part in youth orchestras etc
2: Those who play guitar and other "rock/pop" instruments and form bands etc
I would always try to make it so that those in group 1 do plenty of improvisation, devising, electronics etc
and those from group 2 do plenty of exposure to musics that they would otherwise have no knowledge of
When I did O level music I sang in a church choir, had piano lessons etc It taught me very little and was delivered in a very dull way.
What does count is the enthusiasm and expertise of those working with children, the best music teachers I have met (and the best professional musicians .... Tony Pappano for example) communicate passion and enthusiasm.
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThat is quite correct. O-level was never about musicology - just the nuts and bolts needed for an in-depth understanding of music.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
The problem is that it wasn't an understanding of MUSIC, it was an understanding of a very small amount of the worlds musics.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mary Chambers View PostPerhaps there should be a GCSE (or whatever) in Western Classical Music, so that children at least learn the basics of a tradition which they have inherited. 'The worlds musics' (sic) is rather a lot for one exam.
What we need is for children to be as enthusiastic about MUSIC as a global phenomenon as Debussy, Britten and Mozart were
The 'basics' of the inherited tradition includes music from many places outside Europe (a cursory listen to the EMS would reinforce this as does listening to the music of the three composers mentioned)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mary Chambers View PostPerhaps there should be a GCSE (or whatever) in Western Classical Music, so that children at least learn the basics of a tradition which they have inherited. 'The worlds musics' (sic) is rather a lot for one exam.
It was dreadfully dull, an afterthought to the "serious" subjects, and It ruined Mendelssohn #4 for me.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
When I did O level music I sang in a church choir, had piano lessons etc It taught me very little and was delivered in a very dull way.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mary Chambers View PostPerhaps there should be a GCSE (or whatever) in Western Classical Music, so that children at least learn the basics of a tradition which they have inherited. 'The worlds musics' (sic) is rather a lot for one exam.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI think this may have coloured your thinking, unsurprisingly. I was luckier. My school, piano and oboe teachers were all good - even the young teacher whose harmony lessons were so strict that we called her "Annie" after Annie Warburton.
But a music education that ignores Jazz, Non-Western musics, Improvisation, composition, Electronic music, rock music, music pre 1700 or after 1900 would be rather lacking indeed.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostIt probably did.
But a music education that ignores Jazz, Non-Western musics, Improvisation, composition, Electronic music, rock music, music pre 1700 or after 1900 would be rather lacking indeed.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostTerrible idea IMV
What we need is for children to be as enthusiastic about MUSIC as a global phenomenon as Debussy, Britten and Mozart were
The 'basics' of the inherited tradition includes music from many places outside Europe (a cursory listen to the EMS would reinforce this as does listening to the music of the three composers mentioned)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mary Chambers View PostI am aware of all that, and I wasn't being entirely serious. For some reason I am always intensely irritable when people use the word 'musics'.
like the word Cheeses meaning different types
When people use the word "Music" they don't usually mean different types of music
Your joke seems to have caught on though
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostBut a music education that ignores Jazz, Non-Western musics, Improvisation, composition, Electronic music, rock music, music pre 1700 or after 1900 would be rather lacking indeed.
How long do you have to study to cover 'Jazz, Non-Western musics, Improvisation, composition, Electronic music, rock music' in any useful way? (I leave out 'music pre 1700 or after 1900', since the term classical music in its general sense includes music before 1700 and after 1900).It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostHow long do you have to study to cover 'Jazz, Non-Western musics, Improvisation, composition, Electronic music, rock music' in any useful way?
And "the more breadth, the more superficiality" - this is no more (nor, if you like, "no less") true of History. We're moving away from "Music in Schools" and onto lifelong learning - forty years after I began my "O"-Level History, I still watch every history programme I can, and my book collection has over a hundred books on various historical subjects: it is "broad" and undoubtably "superficial" from the point of view of a professional historian. But schools aren't, and education isn't, just about producing professionals; it includes (or should) encouraging curiosity and instilling a lifelong eagerness to continue finding out about stuff.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostWe're moving away from "Music in Schools" and onto lifelong learningIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment