Do3 - Votes for Women, 15 Sept

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 29926

    Do3 - Votes for Women, 15 Sept

    "Votes for Women is a suffragette play, originally performed in 1907 at the Court Theatre (now the Royal Court), which remains both modern and surprisingly controversial. Writer Elizabeth Robins, an American actress, was hugely admired by London audiences at the time, most notably for her performance as Hedda Gabler.

    "A philanthropist and doyenne of the literati, she was also famed for having pulled a gun on George Bernard Shaw when he made a pass at her [And quite right, too IMHO - Ed]! Votes for Women was originally written as a novel - Robins having done her research by interviewing women about their lives (this forms the middle of the play, set at a rally in Trafalgar Square). It was turned into a play when the suffragette movement realised the power of theatre to affect public opinion and, shortly after its run in London, Robins was instrumental in setting up the Actresses' Franchise League."

    Starring Zoe Tapper and Sam West.

    This is the first in a trilogy of classic plays relating to the emancipation of women.
    Last edited by french frank; 11-09-13, 19:03. Reason: Link added
    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
  • Russ

    #2
    I do hope R3 spruce this up - at best, this sounds like a museum piece, the contemporary reviews being less than enthusiastic, and much of the text comes across as verbose melodrama.

    Russ

    Comment

    • french frank
      Administrator/Moderator
      • Feb 2007
      • 29926

      #3
      Thanks for the links, Russ. It sounds as if it will suffer dramatically from having been written as a campaigning piece to carry some sort of message on women's emancipation. But even museum pieces may have some interest. The opening does have a distinctly 'Edwahdian' air.
      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

      Comment

      • aeolium
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 3992

        #4
        But even museum pieces may have some interest.
        But when there are so many repeats, novel adaptations and biographical dramas, it seems like the disinterment of plays like this (and the Bulwer Lytton some time back) is really like plying us with weak tea and adulterated beer. There is so much better work out there.

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 29926

          #5
          Originally posted by aeolium View Post
          But when there are so many repeats, novel adaptations and biographical dramas, it seems like the disinterment of plays like this (and the Bulwer Lytton some time back) is really like plying us with weak tea and adulterated beer. There is so much better work out there.
          It's a 90-minute play with a largish cast, so won't be cheap. They could get a first rate play for the same money ...
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • jean
            Late member
            • Nov 2010
            • 7100

            #6
            Originally posted by aeolium View Post
            But when there are so many repeats, novel adaptations and biographical dramas...
            ...anything that's actually a play in its own right is something to be welcomed...

            Comment

            • Russ

              #7
              This one is reported as being "the first of three classic plays that responded to the growing freedom of women at the turn of the twentieth century", so we are in dreaded 'BBC theme' mode here, but what will the other two be? Any guesses?

              Doesn't R3 usually issue a list of forthcoming Do3 productions for the upcoming season around this time of year - any info ff?

              Russ

              Comment

              • french frank
                Administrator/Moderator
                • Feb 2007
                • 29926

                #8
                Originally posted by Russ View Post
                This one is reported as being "the first of three classic plays that responded to the growing freedom of women at the turn of the twentieth century", so we are in dreaded 'BBC theme' mode here, but what will the other two be? Any guesses?

                Doesn't R3 usually issue a list of forthcoming Do3 productions for the upcoming season around this time of year - any info ff?

                Russ
                I'll have a scout round.
                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 29926

                  #9
                  Sunday 22 September is Strindberg's The Father - which sounds a bit more like it.

                  Nothing yet for the following week from the Media Centre.
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • Russ

                    #10
                    Considerably better and subtler than I thought it was going to be, despite getting off to a very stodgy start in act one. Act three's denouement was well constructed and paced, with the more polemical and tub-thumping parts edited out of the original text, to leave us with the meat of the personal substance between our two protagonists.

                    Russ

                    Comment

                    • french frank
                      Administrator/Moderator
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 29926

                      #11
                      Yes, it was certainly a drama, if a little complicated at times (I wasn't always sure who was who). Not a great play but it did capture the spirit of the time without seeming too 'stagey' a production. Good performances all round.
                      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                      Comment

                      • amateur51

                        #12
                        Better than I'd feared and as french frank says, it certainly captured the spirit, which is most important.

                        I recall going to see a suffragette musical a few years back at Sadler's Wells on a rainy Sunday afternoon as part of the Forgotten Musicals series in part curated by the late Dick Vosburgh. It wasn't a great musical but by Jessica it caught the spirit too.

                        Back to the play, I thoght it was worth doing, and in this spirited production worth preserving.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X